Paramedic sues for £100k over assault
A PARAMEDIC who was off work for six months after being attacked by a patient is suing ambulance bosses for £100,000 after claiming they did not tell her the call-out was dangerous.
Lynn Sutherland was punched and kicked by 16-year-old Grahame Donnelly after racing to his home amid fears he had taken an overdose of anti-depressants.
The 37-year-old suffered injuries to her arm, ribs, shoulder and neck while trying to restrain the teenager.
Ms Sutherland launched a legal action for damages against the Scottish Ambulance Service at the Court of Session in Edinburgh.
Her lawyers argue that the service failed to warn her that the teenager had already attacked his mother, adding that police should have been in attendance to provide support.
Ms Sutherland, who lives in Dalry, was working with colleague, Martin Gemmell, in Livingston when the pair received a message to attend an emergency in Harthill, North Lanarkshire.
Her lawyers told the court that ambulance colleagues in Paisley tried to inform the dispatch centre minutes later that it was a “violent scene” and that the patient had attacked his mother.
The message triggered a warning bar on a dispatcher’s screen, but she did not see it and failed to inform the crew.
Ms Sutherland and Mr Gemmell arrived at around 10pm and said she met Donnelly’s aunt outside the home but was left with “no reason to suspect the patient was violent”.
Once in the sitting room, Ms Sutherland said that Donnelly’s mother told them she had been assaulted by her son earlier.
Ms Sutherland said that the teenager got to his feet and punched her in the jaw, leading to a violent struggle when she was punched and kicked.
She alerted police, who arrived at 10.23pm. Four officers, along with the paramedics, restrained the patient.
Her lawyers told the court that Scottish Ambulance Service protocols set out that crews should not work in violent incidents without police support
They argued that had the crew known beforehand, they would have requested police back-up and the dispatch centre’s failure to relay the warning constituted a failure to take “reasonable care”.
But lawyers for the service said that it was the teenager’s mother who had been outside the home and warned them of the attack on her.
The service’s lawyers added that it was “not feasible” to “prevent all employees from exposures to violence”.
They contended that the situation would not have been any different if the dispatch centre alerted them over the violent behaviour, or whether the mother did outside.
The solicitors firm representing Ms Sutherland, said it did not want to comment.
A Scottish Ambulance Service spokesman said it could not comment.
- Rangers takeover: Duff & Phelps threaten legal action against BBC
- Family mourn death of Glasgow ‘fight’ schoolboy
- Today’s youth not fit to be employed, says car firm Arnold Clark
- Rangers administration: Fans fear Duff & Phelps claims could scare off Green
- Rangers takeover: triple penalty punishment enough, says Johnston
- Alistair Darling leads ‘No to independence’ fight over tea and biscuits
- Scottish independence: SNP flip-flops over Nato
- Scottish Independence: SNP ‘won’t be Yes campaign’s only voice’
- Today’s youth not fit to be employed, says car firm Arnold Clark
- Scottish independence: ‘People here are best qualified to run Scotland’
Looking for...
Featured advertisers
Jobs
Search for a job
Motors
Search for a car
Property
Search for a house
Weather for Edinburgh
Saturday 26 May 2012
Today
Sunny
Temperature: 8 C to 20 C
Wind Speed: 16 mph
Wind direction: North east
Tomorrow
Sunny
Temperature: 11 C to 21 C
Wind Speed: 10 mph
Wind direction: North east


Comments
There are 7 comments to this article
Page 1 of 1
Mark Bishop
Sunday, February 5, 2012 at 07:56 PMI'd definitely bring charges against the patient and take out a civil suit against him. Why the very people who are there to help get hurt is beyond me. I would have let the boy take the consequences of his actions, a public apology and remove his phone, music system and all of his toys for the six months that this lady was off work. 100K seems excessive though.
sixstrange
Friday, January 27, 2012 at 07:33 PMAll these idiots don't need the professional care and commitment of intelligent paramedics, No one needs to save another wasted life.
VilIage Idiot
Friday, January 27, 2012 at 05:39 PM100k a touch steep IMHO?
jerrymanders
Friday, January 27, 2012 at 04:56 PM#2 If you are being attacked I think you have every right to "place hands" on the attacker! I don't quite understand where £100k comes into it right enough but getting a kicking when you are there to help is above and beyond the call of duty.
fabiosso
Friday, January 27, 2012 at 04:34 PMif it's me i wouldn't bother with him, but this woman was doing her job because she cares, and all the time these people pay the prize, if he died maybe she will be blamed for not doing her job properly,
Dragonlord
Friday, January 27, 2012 at 03:29 PMThere is no case to answer, Why was she trying to restrain the patient in the first place? She had no right to put her hands on him and the police should have been called to take any action required.
Tefer82
Friday, January 27, 2012 at 02:52 PMCan the patient no be sued here??
Page 1 of 1
Your view
Please sign in to be able to comment on this story.