UN to probe new plan for Caltongate
The Caltongate site
Controversial plans for a development at Caltongate are to be examined by the United Nations over fears they could jeopardise the city’s World Heritage Site status.
The £300 million proposals have been described as “ugly and unsympathetic” to the area.
Developed by a South African-led consortium, the new plans are similar to those that prompted Unesco to order the team behind them to re-examine their bid.
The issue was never resolved because the developer, Mountgrange, went out of business.
Now heritage watchdogs are preparing a new case to go to Unesco to prevent the city losing its World Heritage status, it was reported today.
Unesco investigators warned previously that “to avoid the development having an impact on the outstanding universal value, authenticity and integrity of the World Heritage property” developers should carry our a total re-design.
Artisan Real Estate Investors plans to build a 195,000sq ft, five-star hotel with 211 bedrooms, an 18,000sq ft conference centre, around 160,000sq ft of office space, 30 new shops and cafes and 165 new homes.
Marion Williams, director of the Cockburn Association, the city’s civic heritage body, said the group would have a meeting with Edinburgh World Heritage, the charity charged with monitoring the site.
Ms Williams is reported as saying: “There are growing concerns about this development and the damage it will do to the World Heritage status. It is a total intrusion. It is an ugly and unsympathetic development and there will not be a shortage of people who will step up on this issue.”
Detailed plans are due to be lodged with the council within weeks.
Edinburgh World Heritage Committee said that it was unable to comment publicly until then.
David Black of the Historic Buildings Trust has also contacted Unesco, warning Edinburgh could suffer the same fate as the German city Dresden, which was deleted from Unesco’s list in 2009 because of the building of a four-bridge lane in the city.
He said: “This [plan] is delivering the type of corporate blandness which would fit into Milton Keynes or East Kilbride but it is not right for the heart of the World Heritage Site. If Edinburgh was to lose its World Heritage Site status because of this it would have a dreadful impact on Scotland internationally.
“It would be a mark of shame. Dresden lost its status over much less.”
A spokesman for Artisan Real Estate Investors said: “We will shortly be developing detailed designs based on existing mixed-use consents, which were approved in 2008 by the City of Edinburgh Council.
“We are fully aware of the many issues that have surrounded the site and will work closely with the council, consulting with a wide range of local stakeholders and community interests, to ensure our development will do justice to its spectacular and historic setting.”
Email to a friend
Print this page- Rangers takeover: Duff & Phelps threaten legal action against BBC
- Today’s youth not fit to be employed, says car firm Arnold Clark
- Family mourn death of Glasgow ‘fight’ schoolboy
- Rangers administration: Fans fear Duff & Phelps claims could scare off Green
- Rangers takeover: triple penalty punishment enough, says Johnston
- Alistair Darling leads ‘No to independence’ fight over tea and biscuits
- Scottish independence: SNP flip-flops over Nato
- Scottish Independence: SNP ‘won’t be Yes campaign’s only voice’
- Today’s youth not fit to be employed, says car firm Arnold Clark
- Scottish independence: ‘People here are best qualified to run Scotland’
Looking for...
Featured advertisers
Jobs
Search for a job
Motors
Search for a car
Property
Search for a house
Weather for Edinburgh
Friday 25 May 2012
Today
Sunny spells
Temperature: 9 C to 20 C
Wind Speed: 15 mph
Wind direction: East
Tomorrow
Sunny
Temperature: 8 C to 20 C
Wind Speed: 16 mph
Wind direction: North east
Comments
There are 3 comments to this article
Page 1 of 1
One-man-bucket's older twin
Tuesday, January 10, 2012 at 04:13 PMI get the impression that most councillors must live in either a leafy suburb or a posh New Town gaff, and they can't see why those who can't afford such luxury should get to live in Edinburgh's Heritage site. Why can't the blighters be satisfied with a move to Craigmillar, Wester Hailes, Muirhouse or the Inch? When I went to Moray House primary school in the 50s, the Royal Mile was a thriving working class community. There was a butcher's shop next to White Horse Close, and numerous other shops selling the stuff people actually want to buy if they live in the area, and the pubs catered to locals. You may say, why resist change? But change is not necessarily a good thing. Edinburgh council taxpayers are being driven out of their communities to cater to the tourist trade. I can't think of any other city whose council takes such a cavalier attitude to the interests of the hand that feeds it.
nickedinburgh
Tuesday, January 10, 2012 at 02:01 PMWhatever happened to those wonderful designs for this site that appeared in this paper a couple of years ago... the ones that everyone who commented loved, because it actually fitted the site... used local historic architectural idioms... was of a human scale - in other words, all the things the Planning Department hates, in their drive to turn Edinburgh into one gigantic pastiche of Milton Keynes style urban brutalism. The only solution is to sack the entire planning staff and recruit a new team who respects the city's heritage.
Afredo Garcia
Tuesday, January 10, 2012 at 01:51 PMAnd it might be sensible to do a thorough examination of the sources of money invested in the scheme while we are at it. There seem to be some surprising links. Did Mr Anderson undertake due diligence?
Page 1 of 1
Your view
Please sign in to be able to comment on this story.