Bilston Glen camp determined to beat bypass plans

By Gina Davidson
Published on Tuesday 21 February 2012 12:09

NO-ONE knows for sure what happened. It could have been that lit candles inside the tiny makeshift wooden hut were knocked over, perhaps by one of the two dogs who lived there with their owners, setting the place ablaze in a matter of moments.

Whatever the beginnings of the tragedy, the end result was the death of Andrew Millhouse, a 24-year-old student from South Africa, while his friend Leonna O’Neill, a politics and philosophy graduate from Edinburgh University suffered terrible burns to her arms. It’s all too easy to imagine the horror, the screams, the desperation in the dead of night, in the middle of a forest.

Today, just over a year on from the accident, the Bilston Glen anti-bypass protest site is peaceful and calm. The unusually warm February sunshine cuts through the bare branches of the trees. And where Andrew’s temporary home once stood is a memorial to him, decorated with daffodils and snowdrops, created by the campaigners who are still camped out in the woods – some of whom were there that night.

Not too far away there’s also a home-made fire extinguisher tied to a tree – plastic bottles filled with water, their caps pierced so the liquid can by squeezed directly onto flames should the need ever arise again.

“I doubt it would work, though,” says John, a tall, blondish man in his 30s, who speaks in a quiet voice, thick with a Denver accent. “We just have to hope we don’t have a repeat of what happened. My house is the closest one to Andy’s. We don’t know what happened, candles were knocked over, we think. It was a terrible night.

“His family were here just the other week on the anniversary of his death. They flew across from South Africa to scatter some of his ashes. It was nice.”

His partner Monica, a 34-year-old from Spain nods in agreement. “I didn’t know him. I just met him the day he died. I had come to visit on one of the open days and had stayed the night, the night of the fire. But we’ve built a memorial. We think he would like it. His family certainly seemed to like it.”

The death of Andrew Millhouse last year put the Bilston Wood treehouse camp back in the headlines. Yet 2012 will be the tenth year in which activists have been camped out in the woods. While Occupy Edinburgh captured the imagination and the column inches last year with its tent city in St Andrew Square, the camp at Bilston has been proving how successful peaceful occupation of land can be – so far there’s been no road built through the wildlife conservation site.

It was in the late 1990s that the plan to build a 2.8 mile-long dual carriageway – to bypass the village of Bilston and make the route from Straiton to Penicuik quicker – was first suggested.

It was incorporated into Midlothian Council’s local plan, which went out for consultation, and there was soon a large body of campaigners determined that the new stretch of road should never be built. From local people to wildlife and conservation groups, and those charged with protecting the green belt, ultimately there were more than 700 objections and just three letters of support. Yet not only did Midlothian Council grant planning permission but the Scottish Executive backed the decision by refusing to “call in” the application. The then Labour transport minister Sarah Boyack also refused a public inquiry into the whole scheme – despite it being alleged that she was privately against it and would rather the £18.5 million was spent on new rail.

By 2000, those opposing the scheme were known as the “No Alignment Action Group”, and already some were planning more direct action. At the time, Joan Higginson, a member of the group, said it was determined to halt the road and if legal action failed they had not ruled out copying the direct action of the sort used in the protests against the Newbury bypass in England.

However, in 2001 it looked as though things had settled down. The whole plan was put on hold for three years as the council reviewed its capital expenditure. But by then it was too late. Word that the woods, a designated Site of Special Scientific Interest and owned by Edinburgh University, were in danger had spread – and, in the spring of 2002, activists from around the country were setting up camp to ensure that no digger or bulldozers could start removing trees. Ever.

Back then the protesters – including Dogend, a 32-year-old from Edinburgh who had been living on the road as an eco-warrior for years – numbered in the twenties. Today, there’s less than ten. “But the numbers fluctuate,” says John, who has been living in the woods for two years.

“There will be more people arriving as the weather gets better.

“There’s no-one here now who was around ten years ago, but the message is handed on to everyone who comes here. There’s been no movement on the development of the bypass for years now, but it’s still on the agenda as far as we know so this camp will be here until it’s finally decided that it’s never happening.”

The camp certainly seems well established, although those living there are keen to stress that there’s nothing permanent – not even their names, which they are reluctant to give. While some do work, others are on the dole, spending their time working in the camp and its garden.

There’s a library filled with political works on activism, refrigerators – obviously unplugged and rescued from landfill – which store the food they manage to source from supermarket bins, a compost toilet, an area where bands play on the Sundays they hold their open cafe for those interested in the camp and, of course, the 20 treehouses.

“We are on couch-surfing websites these days as well,” smiles John. “That attracts a lot of people to the camp, but they do get involved once they hear about its history. That’s how I came across it. We manage to get by with little or no money.

“We get food which the supermarkets throw out. The only thing we need to buy, really, is tobacco. But the aim of being here is to stop the woods being developed.

“It would cost a fortune for us to be removed, and with the treehouses and rope bridges built high enough, it means the police couldn’t evict us, they’d have to bring in specialists, which is even costlier. It’s all about driving up the costs to make it not worth the while.”

Midlothian Council’s argument for the road was that it was necessary for economic development and that firms interested in moving to the area would go elsewhere unless the dual carriageway was built. While work has been done to construct a new roundabout at Gowkley Moss, the lack of a dual carriageway past Bilston Glen has not put off Asda, Sainsbury’s or any of the other retailers now at Straiton. In the camp’s garden, work is under way to clear ground for planting. Lorrain Voisard, 24, from Switzerland arrived at the camp a few weeks ago after hearing about it on a website.

“But it is about activism,” he says. “It’s an alternative way of living and there’s no separation between the two in my mind.”

For Helen Watt, a 33-year-old Australian who lives in Edinburgh and works as a carer, the camp is where she likes to spend her spare time.

“I came for the first time last summer and just thought it was amazing,” she laughs. “It’s like going travelling without going anywhere, people here are from all over the world. It’s hard to believe they could ever put a road through here now.”

Perhaps the last word, though, should go to Dogend and what he said in 2002. For the activists who’ve followed, the ethos remains: “We will stay as long as it takes to stop a road being built through these woods. It is sacred ground.”

ROAD WARRIORS

THE campaign against the proposed A701 bypass from Straiton to Milton Bridge outside Penicuik began almost as soon as the plans were mooted.

But despite intense lobbying by environmental and conservation campaigners and local people, horrified that the road would cut through green belt land and the Bilston Glen wildlife site, both Midlothian Council and the Scottish Executive gave the go-ahead to a new £18.5 million dual carriageway.

Labour’s then-Scottish transport minister Sarah Boyack also refused a public inquiry into the plans.

As a result, eco-campaigners took to the trees in woodland just off the A701, building their treetop homes just high enough to be out of reach of the police.

That was in 2002, and ten years on, though the people have changed, the desire to stop the road has not.

Comments

There are 11 comments to this article

Order by:

• Newest first
• |
• Oldest first

Page 1 of 1

• 1
• Show all

11

David M. Edinburgh

Wednesday, February 29, 2012 at 02:05 PM

There you go again Mario, making completely unfounded accusations, not one person at bilston glen has ever been prosecuted under the dangerous dogs act, or any of these "serious anti social behavior offences", you are fabricating nonsense with nothing to back up your claims, also as the article said most of these people also hold down jobs and do not rely on "do-gooders" like myself for handouts.It is also worth noting that edinburgh university is no acting as a landlord or the protesters tennants,a court will have to decide who has rightful claim to the land,if you really want rid of these people so much,pressure midlothian council to scrap the bypass plans,they will move on once they are assured the bypass will not go ahead, furthermore, the fire in which andrew died was a tradgedy,but an accidental one, fires happen in houses too and people have been known to die in them, i only hope it never happens to you or any of your loved ones,and god forbid it did that you would be subected to being blamed for the tradgedy by a small minded bigot.

• Report Unsuitable

10

Sally Longlegs

Monday, February 27, 2012 at 11:29 AM

So mario what was this tragic Millhouse death?

• Report Unsuitable

9

harlequin

Saturday, February 25, 2012 at 01:50 PM

Blame Scottish Labour,out of touch as always.

• Report Unsuitable

8

trenchchat

Friday, February 24, 2012 at 04:49 PM

As long as well minded but fairly futiler ' protests' such as this are conducted the state has nothing to worry about -it's like hitting an elephant with a feather. Time these protestors put their energies into creating a better society and that can only come about by radical political change. That change would then have a far better chance of being sustainable for the good of all.

• Report Unsuitable

7

The Genuine Mario Antionette

Thursday, February 23, 2012 at 04:48 PM

Edinburgh University are ultimately responsible for what happens on their property & they knowingly allow people to take up residence in the woods. It's about time that the Proscurator Fiscal & the Health & Safety Executive re-opened the investigation into the tragic Millhouse death to ensure that the University are not being protected from prosecution, particularly in relation to a charge of Culpable Homicide.

• Report Unsuitable

6

The Genuine Mario Antionette

Thursday, February 23, 2012 at 04:30 PM

#3 - "It is also worth noting that dozens of people walk through and past the camp on a daily basis,myself included without fear of being torn apart by cannibals or rabid packs of dogs." - well, that'll explain why the police have charged a number of them with serious anti- social offences, including letting their dogs attack people & animals. If you spent less time kowtowing & exchanging pleasantries & drinking tea & coffee with them & stopped blaming the local teenagers for being the cause of these police visits, then you might realise that these people are a blight on the community & are surviving on the hand outs that you & other "head in the sand" do-gooders, including the VW garage, give.

• Report Unsuitable

5

CityStroller

Thursday, February 23, 2012 at 01:03 PM

Worthless lives contributing nothing, Will they still be there in a hundred years?

• Report Unsuitable

4

Thomas the Tank

Thursday, February 23, 2012 at 12:26 PM

Comment removed by moderator

3

David M. Edinburgh

Wednesday, February 22, 2012 at 02:09 PM

@ the genuine mario antionette- It is clear your opinions are based not on any form of interaction with these people but on your personal prejudices, I live localy and have visited the protesters at bilston glen on a number of occasions, who have been warm and welcoming every time,inviting me to share a tea or coffe with them and answering any questions i have. They are not anti-social,non- conformists but very sociable people who care a grat deal about their cause and often the reason the police visit the camp is to make sure the local teenagaers arent causing too much trouble,which im sure you will know is a much larger problem in the area regarding anti-social behaviour than these "hippies". It is also worth noting that dozens of people walk through and past the camp on a daily basis,myself included without fear of being torn apart by cannibals or rabid packs of dogs.

• Report Unsuitable

2

The Genuine Mario Antionette

Wednesday, February 22, 2012 at 06:26 AM

Edinburgh University are a disgrace allowing people to take up residence in these woods. They are effectively tenants & the University is acting as a land-lord. Hope they have done the H&S and risk assessment checks, not only for their "tenants", but for the law abiding, tax paying members of the community who are subjected to the anti social behaviour of these non-conformists. The police are regular visitors to this camp & face immense difficulties with identification etc. The public are frightened to walk in the area & these "hippies" have no control over their dogs, who roam about hunting for food & terrorising people & animals who happen to be in their path. And, if these people are of no fixed abode, why are the dole people sending giro's to the Bilston Post Office ?.

• Report Unsuitable

1

Dragonlord

Tuesday, February 21, 2012 at 04:56 PM

So for ten years these eco nutters have lived of the state. Time these protest camps were torn down.

• Report Unsuitable

Order by:

• Newest first
• |
• Oldest first

Page 1 of 1

• 1
• Show all

Logged in as:

Comment here. Start typing your comment here:

Post comment

Please adhere to our Community guidelines

Your view

Please sign in to be able to comment on this story.