Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Transport links to Glasgow to be upgraded ahead of Games

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 February 2008
BETTER transport links between Edinburgh and Glasgow are to be established before the 2014 Commonwealth Games to make the most of Scotland's cash bonanza.
The Games are expected to bring an £81 million boost to Scotland's economy, with about £55m to be spent outside Glasgow.

City leaders believe Edinburgh is well-placed to be the biggest beneficiary of that £55m pot, especially with the Game's sec
ond week expected to coincide with the summer festivals' first week. A team of Edinburgh City Council officials are now working to ensure road and rail links between the cities are improved. They want to see more services on the Glasgow Central-Edinburgh Waverley line, providing a direct link to the east end of Glasgow, where most events will take place.

Trunk road operators and motorway maintenance firms have also been contacted to ensure no major roadworks are planned during the Games.

Councillor Tom Buchanan, the city's economic development convener, said 2014 was a chance to "piggyback" on Glasgow's success. He added that Edinburgh could even come out ahead of its west coast rival, as the Capital has virtually no infrastructure costs.

"It is a very exciting time for Glasgow, but Edinburgh could be the biggest recipient of gain," said Cllr Buchanan. "A lot of people will want to visit the Commonwealth Games and Scotland but Glasgow is a finite place. There are only so many visitors its hotels can deal with. Our hotels already do very well in terms of room occupancy, but this is an opportunity for us to do even better."

He added that if the Glasgow-Edinburgh collaboration – which had its funding cut in last week's budget – was to work, the Games was "exactly the kind of area it should be thinking about".

Cllr Buchanan added that he is to ask the body, which receives funding from both city councils, to carry out a study to quantify the exact benefits for both cities.

Transport Scotland said that the Airdrie to Bathgate rail line is due to be completed before 2014, providing an extra four trains an hour between Edinburgh and Glasgow to help cope with extra demand.

It also said that First ScotRail is obliged to provide additional services to and from major events.

A First ScotRail spokeswoman said: "We will continue to work closely with our industry partners to look at where further enhancements can be made to the timetable, ensuring our customers have a train service which meets their requirements."

A Scottish Government spokes-man said Edinburgh would "doubtless be at the top of many tourist itineraries, with the Games taking place at the same time as the Edinburgh festivals".

Road bridge plan slammed as council champions tunnel vision
WEST Lothian Council is to write to the Scottish Government to express its "extreme disappointment" at the decision not to build a tunnel under the Forth.

Ministers instead decided on a second road bridge, which opponents say will be susceptible to closures due to high winds, and corrosion.

At a meeting of the SNP-led council, members voted 15-13 in favour of a Labour motion criticising the Government on the decision.

Labour councillor Jim Swan, who tabled the motion, said: "In light of the recent failure of a cable on the new arc bridge across the Clyde in Glasgow, and reports of cable corrosion in suspension bridges around the world, the crossing proposed by the Scottish Government will be difficult to maintain and costly to construct."

Labour group leader Graeme Morrice said the new bridge would trigger traffic jams in the county. He said: "I have grave concerns about the effect a new road bridge being built almost on the West Lothian boundary with Edinburgh will have on our communities.

"It is unacceptable that the SNP has gone for the cheap option by building a new road bridge. They should have gone for the best option of an immersed tube tunnel."






The full article contains 662 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Red Ken,

South East Asia 25/02/2008 12:33:50
Its about time that they upgrade the M8 to true motorway status. Its a disgrace that the two biggest cities in Scotland have a poor road connection.

It is going to happen, about to happen or has it happened? Who knows, but I bet the Greens and assorted Tree Huggers will be up in arms about the money being spent. They would have us going back to the horse and cart and the most suitable mode of transport.
2

Meep,

Edinburgh 25/02/2008 12:39:02
I got excited when I saw the headline and thought unbearably obnoxious Citylink and obscenely overpriced Scotrail were going to be forced to clean up their acts.

Poor naive me.

I guess visitors will be able to wow the folks back home with tales of the labrynthine, horrific public transport journey between our two major cities only an hour apart.
3

alex paterson,

embra 25/02/2008 13:05:35
The M8 has been in a terrible state for years,if Glasgow never got the games would it ever have been upgraded.
4

Andrew,

25/02/2008 13:27:46
Don't hold your breath as central Scotland has been awaiting the development of Glasgow Crossrail and full electrification of the Edinburgh-Falkirk-Glasgow Q St.(Cumbernauld/Stirling/Dunblane) rail 'triangle' for years, despite numerous reports and endorsing recommendations. Thankfully Stirling-Alloa is nearing completion & Airdrie-Bathgate is finally off the drawing board and ongoing!
5

Niadh,

Edinburgh 25/02/2008 13:35:47
How about that hyper fast rail service that keeps on rearing it's ugly head every so often?
Am i right in remembering it was a maglev system?
That would not only be faster and smoother but it would be a great advert for Scottish engineering.
6

John Blackley,

Winter Garden, FL 25/02/2008 16:19:09
"BETTER transport links between Edinburgh and Glasgow are to be established before the 2014 Commonwealth Games"

Okay, somebody help me here please. Here was I - on reading this leader - expecting to get actual news about actual plans for actual improvements. I think what I read was another round of well-intentioned guff about cooperation between Glasgow and Edinburgh. Did I miss something?

Also, I'd like to add my support to Niadh's idea. Why does Scotland - with its design and engineering prowess - continue to focus on old solutions to old problems? Monorail, maglev - let's see Scotland once again pioneering solutions.
7

Paul R,

25/02/2008 16:20:30
The motorways in Glasgow itself aren't too bad but ocne you leave the city the M8 is no longer a motorway and the M80 turns into the A80, passing through built-up areas with traffic light junctions. Isn't this the 21st century?
8

Why can't I use my usual name?,

Glasgow 25/02/2008 17:35:11
#1, #8, both the remaining A8 bit of the M8 and the A80 are scheduled for upgrading. The Road Orders have been published for the A8, not sure where the A80 is at. They are embarrassing at the moment though...

#5, #8 - but where would these new systems run to? The advantage of "conventional" TGV-style trains is that they can use the existing network (incl to England), where there's no room to build new stuff (mostly on the way in/out of the cities). I'm not against greater ambition but it has to be thought through. Cost too: would one big vanity project (?) be better than a whole series of smaller ones that benefit a much wider group of people?
9

Why can't I use my usual name?,

Glasgow 25/02/2008 17:37:47
re: my "#5,#8" comment - I mean #5,#7!

I do agree though, #7, that this is just a reheat of various existing transport announcements using the C. Games as an excuse. Space-filler-tastic!
10

SS,

25/02/2008 18:10:13
It'll never happen - read the headline in the sister paper :-)

http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/latestnews/Why-does-it-take-so.3810441.jp
11

rpb,

25/02/2008 18:35:54
When the Robert Maxwell Commonwealth Games came to Edinburgh in 1986, the transport investment was a temporary train halt at Abbeyhill.



12

Julian,

EDINBURGH 25/02/2008 22:44:21
#9,

Are you sure the current rails can be easily upgraded to TGV? Personally, I quite like the maglev idea. OK, it's going to cost a bit more but journey times of 20 minutes between the 2 cities. That's going to virtually make them into 1 city. There will be lots of objections on that basis of course;-)

13

Julian,

EDINBURGH 25/02/2008 22:46:08
#7 John Blackley,

Your comments was most unfair. What about the mention of 4 more trains an hour. And then there's.....err, well that's about it.
14

Why can't I use my usual name?,

Glasgow 25/02/2008 23:50:57
#13, the point about TGV-technology is that it can use existing rails - not for high-speed running admittedly - but to get into the city centres on existing lines - just the same as Eurostar shared lines into Waterloo with commuter trains. Once you're out of the built-up area then new, dedicated tracks are needed to take advantage of the high-speed trains - but land there is much more plentiful and cheap.

It's not really clear how you could get a maglev into central Glasgow or Edinburgh (or London or Birmingham or Manchester, etc).

#15, its not for the tourists - that's just the EEN's silly new spin on projects that were announced last year...
15

Julian,

EDINBURGH 26/02/2008 01:01:42
#16,

The high speed running is quite an important point. Upgrading the tracks is going to be the least of it. I seem to remember an article estimating the figure at £3/4 billion for a high speed line.

On the maglev point, why could you not run the trains in and out of the 2 cities?
16

Londonroadguy,

nearby 26/02/2008 04:22:15
Fantastic comments but I think were gonna get the anti tram brigage giving us a downer now.
17

Julian,

EDINBURGH 26/02/2008 04:37:25
#18,

And that's another thing. If it wasn't for those damn trams we'd have enough money to link all Scottish cities with Maglevs.
18

Galaman,

Galashiels 26/02/2008 10:34:53
#8 & #9 - proposals to plug the gaps in the M80 and M8 have been on the cards for decades and decades and decades. The ones mostly to blame for the lack of progress are the anti-road, anti-car Greens.
19

Why can't I use my usual name?,

Glasgow 26/02/2008 11:24:23
#20, that's not really true. Successive governments have generally preferred to put off spending big bucks on infrastructure or reforming the planning process to speed these sorts of decisions. The Greens weren't a political force pre-Holyrood.

#19, the tram is "only" about £600m or so. As you say yourself, a fast linke, even E-G only would be in the billions.
20

Julian,

EDINBURGH 26/02/2008 15:26:18
#21

Thanks for that. It was my attempt at humour. Aimed at the anti-tram brigade who always exagerrate their claims.
21

Pundit,

Glasgow 27/02/2008 02:19:58
Great to hear we can spread the benefits of the 2014 Games.
Any improvement to the transport links have got to be welcomed.
I thought the idea of a new Forth crossing was a contingent on the present bridge being beyond repair, as I understand it the drying out of cables on suspension bridges has been successfully done in many other places around the world. The initial reports suggest that the current scheme is going well. So why build another bridge to replace a bridge that will almost certainly be able to be maintained. Seems a gross waste of a huge amount of public money. Money that could be better spent in improving other means of transport
22

Southsider71,

East ren, Glasgow 28/02/2008 00:51:40
Hopefully any transport links will bypass #6 entirely

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.