KPMG in row over leaked CO2 report
A ROW over the costs of Britain’s future energy mix has escalated after trade body Scottish Renewables demanded that a controversial economic report be made public.
The paper by accountancy firm KPMG and analysts at AF Consult claimed that the UK could meet its carbon dioxide (CO2)-reduction targets without the need to produce higher levels of renewable energy.
Figures from energy regulator Ofgem suggest it will cost the UK some £108 billion to hit its 2020 target of cutting the amount of CO2 emitted by 34 per cent, compared to 1990’s levels.
But the KPMG report claims £34bn could be sliced off the total by concetrating on gas-fired and nuclear power stations instead of off-shore wind, which adds £10bn to the bill.
Those figures were revealed in November in a press release that the accountancy firm claims was “leaked”. The issue was brought to a head when the data formed part of a documentary by the BBC’s Panorama television series.
The press release said the report was based on the “pure economics” of producing energy and that other factors, such as job creation, also needed to be taken into account.
Now Scottish Renewables wants KPMG to publish the full report so that it can examine the calculations made to reach the figures.
Scottish Renewables chief executive Niall Stuart said: “The conclusions seem to rely on some extremely pessimistic assumptions about the costs of renewables and some extremely positive ones about the future cost of gas and nuclear power.”
Stuart added: “The releasing of the report’s findings in this way has undoubtedly damaged the previously excellent reputation of KPMG within the renewable energy sector.
“The releasing of selective conclusions that are particularly negative about renewables ahead of the publication of the report has eroded goodwill among current and potential clients in our sector.”
A KPMG spokesman said: “We are aware of the leaked press release. We hope to be in a position to release the official, full report findings shortly and will be in touch as soon as we can on timing.”
- Alistair Darling leads ‘No to independence’ fight over tea and biscuits
- Scottish independence: SNP flip-flops over Nato
- Scottish Independence: SNP ‘won’t be Yes campaign’s only voice’
- Today’s youth not fit to be employed, says car firm Arnold Clark
- Rangers takeover: Duff & Phelps threaten legal action against BBC
Looking for...
Featured advertisers
Jobs
Search for a job
Motors
Search for a car
Property
Search for a house
Weather for Edinburgh
Friday 25 May 2012
Today
Sunny
Temperature: 10 C to 21 C
Wind Speed: 14 mph
Wind direction: North east
Tomorrow
Sunny
Temperature: 9 C to 20 C
Wind Speed: 15 mph
Wind direction: North east


Comments
There are 2 comments to this article
Page 1 of 1
Kobi
Sunday, January 22, 2012 at 07:52 PMSo on the one hand the renewables (aka "subsidies for rich people while killing the poor") industry want to see the report that exposes their industry as a scam, but on the other hand does not want the Government to release any details of the researchcalculationsmade up fairy stories used to inform UK ministers in agreeing to the pie-in-the sky international agreements on controlling carbon emissions? Methinks the renewables industry is populated by a bunch of charlatans and chancers who make Sir Fred Goodwin look like a paragon of virtue and honesty.
nabodican
Sunday, January 22, 2012 at 06:53 PMOh dear Niall Stuart is upset because the truth is coming out and he does not want the gravy train to end. What a plonker the man is.
Page 1 of 1
Your view
Please sign in to be able to comment on this story.