Greener methods 'could be profitable for farmers'

Published on Tuesday 2 December 2008 20:49

SCOTLAND'S farmers and foresters can play a major role in hitting government targets for cutting greenhouse gas emissions, according to a report published by the Scottish Agricultural College.

The two largest rural industries could cut emissions by 25 per cent by 2020 at very little cost, according to the report. Some farmers could actually find themselves in pocket.

Dominic Moran, of SAC, said: "There always comes a point when the cost of reducing emissions is greater than any benefit gained. However, up to that point some relatively straightforward measures offer the possibility of substantial cuts at low costs. Potentially it is a win-win situation."

The SAC report suggests that farmers growing arable crops or grass who pay close attention to fertiliser management, make better use of manures and reduced ploughing through minimal tillage techniques, could cut their emissions and reduce input costs.

At the same time, breeding cattle that release less methane should be a target, but this is a complex issue where there are no easy solutions.

That much was acknowledged by John Gilliland, a farmer from Northern Ireland and a leader in the UK government's drive for a cleaner environment.

He said: "Some methods of cutting methane production by cattle are effective, but would have animal welfare implications. Policymakers will need to balance priorities.

"Cuts as much as 25 per cent may not be required, but the land-based industries should be part of any programme for cutting emissions."