Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 23rd November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

RAF rescue copter crews will be sent to war zones



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 August 2008
THE number of RAF search and rescue crews in Britain is to be slashed by a fifth to bolster operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, raising fears that response times will suffer.
The Ministry of Defence yesterday confirmed it will reduce the number of crews at each of the UK's six RAF search and rescue centres by one.

Currently, five four-man crews operate from Lossie-mouth in north-east Scotland, Anglesey, Wattisham, Leco
nfield, Boulmer and Chivenor. The number of crews at each base will be reduced to four, with personnel being freed to fly helicopters in war zones.

An MoD spokesman said the move would enable more helicopters to be flown in operational theatres – reducing the number of roadside bomb deaths. He said the move would come into effect in 2011, as the search and rescue crews – who fly Sea Kings – will have to be trained to pilot Chinooks and other helicopters used in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The spokesman added: "We will be redirecting personnel so they can go into the pool of helicopter aircrews that are deployable in operations. The more helicopter crews we can send out, the more helicopters we can have in the air."

The spokesman said they could be used in conflict zones to transport people and equipment, as well as rescuing casualties. Extra helicopters in Afghanistan are seen as vital. Twenty-seven of the last 33 soldiers killed in Afghanistan died as a result of roadside bombs or land mines. Commanders say unless they get more helicopters many more soldiers will die.

The MoD spokesman said: "There has been a long-term desire to get more helicopters and more crews out to theatre so we can do less work with land vehicles, which can be exposed to IEDs (improvised explosive devices] and mines."

The RAF crews respond to about 1,000 emergency calls a year, from rescuing holidaymakers in difficulties to the 2004 floods that devastated Boscastle in Cornwall. Industry insiders say the move will risk the ability of the search and rescue service to respond to any emergency within an hour, and will reduce the amount of cover when crew are on holidays.

Angus Robertson, the SNP defence spokesman and MP for Moray, where the Lossiemouth Search and Rescue team is based, voiced concern at the move.

He said: "It is concerning both that there is a shortage of helicopters and trained crews in Afghanistan and that vital search and rescue services have to be cut to meet that need. It is essential our troops in Afghanistan are properly equipped and protected with the right resources, but the Ministry of Defence must be very careful not to leave search and rescue under-resourced or unable to do their jobs."

He added: "This decision exposes the folly of proposals to privatise search and rescue services and the UK government must commit to maintaining these services in the public sector."

The MoD stressed that the RAF search and rescue teams would still have "at least one committed stand-by helicopter at six bases throughout the UK. This will not affect normal search and rescue capability."

The spokesman said it could still call on coastguard and police helicopters if a major incident demanded it. The move also reflects the expectation that Britain will maintain a significant military presence in Afghanistan for years.





The full article contains 565 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 August 2008 9:40 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: British armed forces
 
1

Jock MacSprog,

04/08/2008 00:52:23
The RAF is a military/combat force. There should be Coast Guard and police helicopters to deal with lost Hillwalkers and Coastal water maritime incidents. I see no problem with deploying the RAF to a combat theater, its what they are there for and what these men train for. I think some people seem to forget that the military is more than fancy dress uniforms, parades and guarding Wimbledon
2

indune1,

Canada 04/08/2008 03:03:31
1 - Jock - Spot on!! Well said.
3

Old Siggy,

Dunbar 04/08/2008 07:58:11
#1 and 2
"I see no problem with deploying the RAF to a combat theater.........." You don't say!! I believe the RAF is already in Iraq and Afghanistan in sufficient numbers. I recently retired from the RAF after 33 years service and flew many SAR missions, the majority of which were to locate fishing trawlers in distress hundreds of miles offshore or to assist in major incidents such as Piper Alpha. I don't recall ever wearing "fancy dress" during those missions.
By the way, I think you will find that the word you are looking for is "theatre". Have a nice day.
4

Guga II,

Rockall 04/08/2008 08:28:13
It's time our forces were brought out of Afghanistan anyway. All we are doing there is helping Bush and his business buddies to build their oil pipeline.

As for #1 & #2, the RAF SAR helicopters do a very valuable, essential, highly skilled and dangerous job and, as pointed out by #3, the majority of their work involves maritime missions.
5

Jock MacSprog,

04/08/2008 09:01:21
#3, in your quest to find spelling errors you totally missed the point of the post, which was that the exact missions you cite should be conducted by the coast guard.

As for #4 you are a hypocrite and idiot, if you had your way there would be no military anyway so its disingenuous and phony of you to try to defend them.
6

Guga II,

Rockall 04/08/2008 10:49:22
#5.

Being a cretin, and coming from England, you obviously do not realise how essential the RAF SAR are.

As for the military, once Scotland is independent, we will only need any military for self-defence. We will not be pursuing illegal wars to help the Septics gain control over middle-east oil.

7

Jock MacSprog,

04/08/2008 10:55:44
6, I was going to point out what a moron you were, but you successfully did that yourself in your second paragraph ! And why do you think that anyone who disagrees with you is from England ? Is that part of the standard SNP idiots guide to debate ? Born and bred in Edinburgh my mentally challenged friend.
8

Matt there,

Somewhere 04/08/2008 11:45:46
More proof that Broon and co are over-stretching our armed forces. We should get out of Iraq and Afganistan sooner, not later.
9

Old Siggy,

Dunbar 04/08/2008 16:51:44
#5
There is no need to have a "quest" for spelling errors when they stare you in the face. If you are going to blog on a British website, do try to use the English language. Your argument that SAR missions should be conducted by the Coastguard is a fantasy. We do not possess and cannot afford the assets that the US coastguard have, such as long range patrol aircraft and coastguards cutters and frigates.
10

Jock MacSprog,

04/08/2008 23:50:33
Siggy, if we can afford a new f-off aircraft carrier for global force projection, why can we not afford a few long range helos to protect our own coastline ?
11

J4cko,

13/09/2008 00:43:36
Military? Coastguard? I don't care so long as there are helicopters there to rescue people should they need it!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.