Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Delay of destroyers 'deeply worrying' for UK defences

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 23 June 2009
DELAYS in the launch of a new fleet of Royal Navy destroyers could have "deeply worrying implications" for the UK's ability to defend itself against enemy aircraft, a committee of MPs warned today.
The first Scots-built Type 45 destroyer is set to enter service later this year, more than two years late and with the project running £1.5 billion over budget, even though it will not be fully operational.

Edward Leigh, Conservative chairman of the Commons public accounts committee, said it was "disgraceful" that its crucial anti-aircraft missile system had not been fully tested.

The committee found that delays to the project meant ageing Type 42 destroyers had been patched up and kept in service for longer. Mr Leigh said: "HMS Daring, the first of the six Type 45s, will not now enter service until the end of 2009, over two years late and £1.5 billion over the original budgeted cost.

"What is disgraceful is that it will enter service with not one of its main anti-air missiles having been fired from the ship.

The fleet of Type 45s will not have their full capability until well into the next decade."





The full article contains 204 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 22 June 2009 10:13 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: British armed forces
 
1

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 23/06/2009 09:50:53
Last I heard of it we had more Admirals than ships!

And even more quangos than admirals...
2

dhu loch,

Inveraray 23/06/2009 10:56:22
£1.5 billion over original budgeted cost? What about the credit crunch and deflation?Where is the incentive to produce these boats on time when you make more money by'hangin it oot'.
3

Kenny A,

23/06/2009 11:57:44
5 Dour but on the ball.

All the forces are being maimed, lives lost because the government still does not recognise requirements but is more than happy to throw troops almost naked into any situation they feel like.

The US and stand by for this one has a much better approach, all the equipment required. Training no where near the same. Israel, Taiwan, S Korea and Japan, sorted matters out years ago.

If these new destroyers are fully operational within the next 10 years I will be surprised. How long has the much vaunted Eurofighter been awaited.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.