Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 25th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Obama plays family card



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 May 2008
MICHELLE Obama has been thrown as a media weapon into America's primary race as it enters its latest bruising round, with her husband Barack struggling to win back ground lost to Hillary Clinton.
The senator's wife has teamed up with Caroline Kennedy, daughter of the late John F Kennedy, to tour Indiana ahead of its primary next week.

In her first full media interview for weeks, she was at pains to show she identified with blue-collar v
oters who polls show distrust her husband.

Sporting signs of a dress and hair makeover, Mrs Obama told CNN: "We're a young couple with small kids with all the challenges and the emotions and the stresses that come with raising kids, like being a working mum."

Later, she described to an audience in Indianapolis how they struggled, like any other young couple in Middle America, to raise two children and pay off debts. "We are still so close to the lives that most Americans are living," she said.

A Harvard-trained lawyer, Mrs Obama, 44, is on leave from her job as a hospital administrator and now divides her time between campaigning and raising the couple's two daughters – Sasha, six, and Malia, nine.

The move to bring her forward comes as Mr Obama continues to count the cost of comments from his former pastor, the Rev Jeremiah Wright, which have seen the senator's poll numbers tumble.

Mr Wright's assertion that Mr Obama secretly held his views, which include the assertion that the US government invented the Aids virus, has seen Mr Obama's ten point poll lead over Mrs Clinton evaporate. Mr Obama earlier this week branded Mr Wright's views, including his support for anti-semitic black leader Louis Farrakhan, as "divisive and destructive".

Mr Obama himself yesterday sought to convince Americans he was not elitist. In an interview on NBC's Today Show, he said both his rivals, Democrat Hillary Clinton and Republican John McCain, come from more privileged backgrounds than his.

North Carolina's large African-American population is expected to give Mr Obama a victory when that state votes next Tuesday. But it is in Indiana, which votes on the same day, that he needs a win. This state, like Ohio and Pennsylvania, is dominated by white blue-collar voters who have until now backed Mrs Clinton.

And it is Mrs Clinton's success in holding on to these voters, despite being behind Mr Obama in the primary contest, that is keeping her campaign alive.

She has drawn strength from polls showing that 64 per cent of Democrats think the Wright affair has harmed Mr Obama.

Race is the great unspoken factor in these elections. Few opinion polls even ask whether white voters would object to a black president, though one poll that did last week found 19 per cent declaring they would not. More voter doubts are likely to be stirred by Mr McCain's mention of another unwanted Obama endorsement, that of Hamas, an organisation pledged to wipe out Israel.

Mr Obama himself has long recognised that for a black to be accepted in white society is a delicate issue, writing in his book Audacity of Hope that it depended on "making no sudden moves".

Mrs Clinton, meanwhile, insists her campaign is rejuvenated. After last month's victory in Pennsylvania, her campaign claimed she raised $10 million in contributions in a day.

And she continues to get high-profile endorsements, the latest being from North Carolina governor Michael Easley. A win in Indiana will keep alive a campaign strategy that depends on convincing party superdelegates that, while Mr Obama has won the most votes, she is the sounder candidate.

Yet for all the bluster surrounding the Wright affair, and Mr Obama's earlier comments in which he labelled small town Americans as "bitter", Mrs Clinton's chance of success remains a long shot. This is because Mr Obama has the numbers on his side. Assuming there is no further collapse in his support, even a win in Indiana will leave Mrs Clinton further behind Mr Obama in pledged, or elected, delegates than the 160-vote gap that now separates them.

Try though she might, Mrs Clinton is a long way from convincing superdelegates that they should go against the popular vote and make her the nominee. Such a thing has never happened in primary history and the party top brass fear it would haemorrhage support.

The latest to say so publicly is former president Jimmy Carter, who has gone public in insisting that were the elite to go against the candidate with the most pledged votes "it would be very uncomfortable".

He was joined by former Democratic national committee chairman Joe Andrew, a superdelegate, who announced yesterday he was switching his support from Mrs Clinton to Mr Obama, saying it was for the good of the party.

'YOU CAN TALK TO HER. SHE'S LIKE YOUR FRIEND'

IN AN interview on NBC's Today Show, Michelle Obama yesterday said she was sometimes angered by coverage of the campaign.

"I take the newspaper and I ball it up and I throw it in the corner," she said. "You don't want anybody talking poorly about the people you love."

The sometimes blunt-spoken Michelle Obama grew up on the South Side of Chicago, raised by her father, a city worker, and her mother, a secretary and then a stay-at-home mother.

The Obama campaign sees her as someone whose down-to-earth style goes over well.

But she has stirred controversy, such as when she said in February: "For the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country." Critics said the comment suggested she had not been proud of her country before her husband's candidacy.

Yesterday, the Obamas visited the home of Cheryl and Mike Fischer in Indiana for a lunch of sandwiches.

"You can just talk to her. She's like your girl friend," Mrs Fischer said afterwards.





The full article contains 987 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 May 2008 11:01 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Barack Obama
 
1

,

02/05/2008 03:49:27
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

ms. ruby,

delaware 02/05/2008 04:49:50
I don't understand why blue collar workers are supporting Hillary, and why do they distrust Obama?? This makes no sense to me, because:

Hillary worked hard to get NAFTA passed and now says she's opposed to it.
Hillary CLAIMS she is opposed to Columbian trade deal, but has her chief economic advisor making a trip to South America during her campaign to get it passed and also Hillary has openly told people that her husband and advisor Bill Clinton is pushing for the Columbian trade deal. How can she have two advisors working against her, or perhaps she's not really against those two trade deals, but just says that to get blue collar votes.

How can blue collar workers say they don't trust Obama when it is Hillary Clinton who plants questions in her crowds to avoid the real questions.

How can people trust Hillary when she lied about Bosnia sniper fire and sends her daughter who was also with her in Bosnia to campaign at campuses, but Chelsea did not correct her mother's story.

How can people trust Hillary when she was so adamant about getting a law passed to keep her Wellesly College thesis from being viewed by public under a special law to keep the college thesis of presidents and first ladies unaccessible to public.

These are just a few things that I wish people would see about Hillary and her contradictions.

Also, this week, Hillary stated to interviewer Bill O'Reilly: "RICH PEOPLE, GOD BLESS US WE DESERVE ALL THE OPPORTUNITIES TO MAKE SURE OUR COUNTRY AND OUR BLESSING CONTINUE TO THE NEXT GENERATION."

Does that statement by Hillary CLinton this week really show what Hillary plans to do for the rich or for the working class???
3

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 02/05/2008 15:14:06
I don't think its really proper to eliminate what I posted in #1. The things I said there are documented in books. Ambrose evans Pritchard the english author and journalist wrote some of the things I related in a book and it was based on sworn testimony. Our leaders in America are sometimes very foul people. and when we merely speak about it even though I didn't use any foul language, it is removed.

My story-line was that I was wondering outloud if McCain or Clinton will play the family card. and telling that both McCain & Clinton have a track record regarding their families that are less than sterling at least when we use normal standards as the benchmark.
4

John Blackley,

Florida 02/05/2008 15:41:35
Now I think the Obama campaign is in trouble!

Michelle Obama is not the typical Stepford wife of a politician and has not been trained to 'stand there, shut up and wave' as so many other politicians' wives have. She may well voice opinions and remarks that voters find disagreeable.

Something like a Harvard-trained lawyer claiming, in front of an audience in a blue-collar state that she and her family "are still so close to the lives that most Americans are living".

Absolute rubbish.
5

Sandi,

San Diego 02/05/2008 15:49:47
Young couple with children? I suppose 44 and 47 are the new 24 and 27.

#2 ms. ruby,delaware

Hillary Clinton is trusted by blue-collar workers because she has delivered for them in the past, as did her husband when he was president. She has never personally supported NAFTA, but as the wife of the president was unable to speak out publicly against his policy. People who were there at the time say now that she was never happy with it. She now would make significant changes.

Mark Penn, who travelled to Colombia on behalf of his firm-nothing to do with Hillary Clinton-was never her "chief economic advisor". Clearly, Hillary and Bill disagree about this issue, but it is Hillary who will be president, not Bill. Just as he didn't always follow her advice (NAFTA), so she will not always follow his.

How can anyone trust Obama when he has lied about his entire life?

http://savagepolitics.com/?page_id=326

Hillary Clinton's statement on The O'Reilly Factor is taken compeletly out of context. They were discussing how she will raise taxes on the rich, including both herself and O'Reilly.

Hillary has the momentum right now. Obama is toast. It makes no difference what he says or how he tries to explain or ignore pastor Wright. He sat in those pews for twenty years listening to that trash. Americans won't forget that, and if we are unfortunate enough to have him as the Democratic nominee, the Republican Party certainly won't forget. They are already running tv commercials against Democratic candidates including Obama and Wright.
6

Sandi,

San Diego 02/05/2008 15:53:15
#4 John Blackley,Florida

Michelle Obama has already voiced remarks that most Americans found offensive. Remember how she wasn't proud of her country until her husband started to run for the presidency?
7

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 02/05/2008 16:34:56
I think Ms Ruby in #2 makes a very logical case. But the Clintons were educated at Yale and the Obamas educated at Harvard. Both are elite institutions.

Hilary Clinton may say she'll modify NAFTA, but I don't give her any credibility on this. She's not going to roll back the trade treaties, she's not going to order our trade policy for our benefit. People forget, Hilary Clinton has contempt for ordinary Americans. She said so in several statements she made between 1993 & 1995. She may not have said so explicitly, but it was the unmistakable implication. People are reluctant to like Hilary because she has a track record.

But it is also true that the Americans are very easily influenced by propaganda. What we've witnessed recently in the mass media is propaganda against Obama. I'm sure that all 3 candidates, Obama, Clinton & McCain are servants of the people who rule us. But Obama has been judged as being an inadequate servant and thus he's been attacked in the mass media.

8

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 02/05/2008 16:46:01
All 3, McCain, Clinton & Obama are servants of the people who rule us. Perhaps Obama has been judged too rebellious by those people and I would estimate that is why he's been attacked in the media.

However, Obama showed a propensity to get votes that was better than Hilary Clinton's. Or McCain's quite frankly. Lets not forget that Bush is per yesterday's news the most unpopular president in US history. Only 27% of the voters have a positive view of the republican party now. That hasn't been the case since 1964. Some of that unpopularity is going to rub off on whoever the Republican nominee is.

I don't put any confidence in our election system. As I've told you the only candidates allowed to exist by this time in the process are puppets of those who rule us. and then they decide which puppet they want to win and they make it happen, that is how it works. But of these last 3 candidates Obama is the one that is genuinely able to get the votes. If he's being taken down a peg now it is because of orchestrated propaganda coming against him.
9

Sandi,

San Diego 02/05/2008 17:48:00
#8 Wally,

Actually, Hillary Clinton has more popular votes than Obama when you include Florida and Michigan. Over 2 million people voted in those two states and they will eventually be counted. The DNC really has no option. The caucuses either don't keep records of how many voters participated at all, or they are very inaccurate, so it's impossible to have an exact number.

http://preview.tinyurl.com/2hbf4a
10

American,

02/05/2008 18:28:26
#9-sandi-hillary won the popular vote in michigan because obamas name wasnt on the ballot.
Also, heard other snippets from mrs. obama-she is a racist!! Too bad the pictures of him not pledging to the flag (while those around him did), and his true association with william ayers, and his place on a committee which sympathises with palestinian terrorists didnt make as much news as his association with his pastor did. Hillary would surely be the definite demo. nominee. Still cant stand any of the 3 though. Only difference between the three is that one is a woman, one is a black man, and the other is an old white man. They all s#ck.

11

John Blackley,

Florida 02/05/2008 18:35:15
Sandi, Ms. Clinton would also have more popular votes than Obama when I include Ireland, I have no doubt. But I do have doubts that Ireland will be included.

On what do you base your (somewhat hopeful) assertions that "they will eventually be counted." and "The DNC really has no option."?
12

Sandi,

San Diego 02/05/2008 18:48:17
#10 American

Hillary won the popular vote in Michigan. It wouldn't have made any difference if Obama had left his name on the ballot, she would still have won. He would never have taken it off if he had thought he had a chance of winning. It was a huge mistake to take it off and it was his own idea, nobody asked him to.

The Ayers connection will come out in full if Obama is the nominee, the RNC will see to that. Here's more detail than you probably want to know:

http://preview.tinyurl.com/4qtew7

And an audio interview with a man who was nine years old when the his home was bombed by Ayers' wife, Bernadine Dohrn.

http://preview.tinyurl.com/55aj36
13

Sandi,

San Diego 02/05/2008 18:51:16
#11 John Blackley,

Because if those two states are not counted the Democratic Party has no chance of winning either state in November. The DNC will make a decision about this in June. By refusing to count any of the delgates, the DNC has broken its own rules which state that half should be counted.
14

Caora Dubh,

Croit sheasgair 02/05/2008 19:05:28
I have been laughing for a few months now. If Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton were presidential material they would have realised that their fight is killing the Democrats' chances of success, and they would have negotiated an agreement as to which of them would become Presidents and Vice-president in the vent of a Democratic victory, so stopping this idiotic fight. Sadly neither is capable of doing this; both are too greedy to sacrifice their own presidential hopes for the sake of a Democratic victory, which means that the Democrats do NOT have a decent presidential candidate in either of them. Not that the Republicans are any better, but at least they settled their own squabbles quickly.
15

Tobytoo,

Southington,U.S.A. 02/05/2008 19:45:49
#7 Wally, Hillary Clinton went to Wellesly College
16

Sandi,

San Diego 02/05/2008 19:47:23
I think that if the media had done its job and looked into Obama's background last year, there would be no fight and Hillary Clinton would have won the nomination some time ago.
17

57Nomad,

california 02/05/2008 19:52:48
I continue to be amused by the terms 'blue collar' and 'working class' as if those terms refer to a subspecies of hom0 sapiens. Anyone with a job is a member of the working class, that pertains to about 99% of all Americans over the age of 15. Blue collar workers are those who don't wear a suit to work like the two guys who just steam cleaned my carpets. There we two of them. They were here for three hours. I paid them $675.00. That comes out to about a hundred dollars and hour apiece, gross. Boo fricking Hoo. Those terms are hold overs from the 1930's. No one is stuck in any 'class.' A person washing dishes at minimum wage can take themselves down to the nearest community college and in two years earn a certificate that will qualify them for a job making $20.00 dollars and hour. Anyone unsatisfied with their paychecks should take this first step: Quit spending your time whining. After you stop acting like a baby, improve yourself with your own efforts and stop waiting for the government to take care of you like your mommy did and act like a grown-up and get to work.
18

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 02/05/2008 20:06:45
TobyToo, Hilary went to Wellesly College for undergraduate degree. That is still an elitest institution. Then she went to Yale for her law school. I still insist that all of them are sympathetic to those who rule us and not to us.

I think McCain went to US Naval Academy at Annapolis, Maryland. Thats not so much an elitest school the way Yale & Harvard are. but I still think of McCain as an elitest. You can't serve at a high level in US government unless you are.

That's a reason why the so-called left-right paradigm is useless to we the Americans. It only serves to confuse us and distort reality. because the people that rule us are against us. and we the people need to unite against them. Our leaders in both parties are usually co-opted by the people that rule us, not loyal to us, loyal to them instead.

Thank-you Sandi for informing me that Hilary won popular vote in Michigan & Florida and that with these counted in she would have more than Obama. I didn't know that. But Obama has brought a lot of new voters into the Democrat party.


19

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 02/05/2008 20:44:58
King Nimrod in 17:

I think you have a warped impression of how our economy works for many of our people. Let me give you some basic facts.

In 2000 over 69% of all adults who lived in the US from age 21 to 65 had jobs. Today it is 62%. Thanks to your Republicans Nimrod we've had a huge flood of immigrants into our country and it just keeps coming. And as a result of this population growth from the immigrants we must create a minimum of 150,000 new jobs each month just to keep the current proportion of our population employed. Since the summer of 2001 we have rarely met that standard. The latest statistic is that we lost 80,000 jobs in one month and over 300,000 in 3 months.

Professor Matloff of UC-Davis did a big study about 10 years ago and found that less than 30% of the US graduates in engineering & computer science actually get careers in their field that last more than 3 or 4 years. Since 2000 the number of young students majoring in these things has declined by about 40% because of this. Many college graduates today in the US are finding that they don't get appropriate jobs and that college does not help them.

you're the one King Nimrod that is living in the past. Perhaps that is the America you experienced in SoCal when you were younger. Today you are retired and you are out-of-touch.

Blue-collar people have been hurt particularly bad by the trade treaties and 'strong-dollar' systems that have wiped out many blue-collar jobs in America. The elite in America purposely decided to sacrifice these jobs to china. That is what it was about when we went along with the currency peg to the Chinese yuan that began in the Clinton administration. The bad trade treaties were first negotiated under the 1'st Bush, then signed by President Clinton. So why blue-collar people would have any loyalty to a Clinton I have no clue. But they do.
20

Black Beard,

02/05/2008 21:11:53
Nomad, a brand new steam cleaner costs about 200. With an immigrant to work it we're talking 400 max with a new vacuum in the bargain. You got seriously hosed.
21

CombatVet68,

New Babylon 02/05/2008 22:16:09
#6 Sandi

I am white and I must admit that it has been a very long time since I can say that I am proud of my country (politicians and our government). NO, I am nt real excite about Obama OR Hillary!
22

SouthernGent,

02/05/2008 22:26:55
#19

" Thanks to your Republicans Nimrod we've had a huge flood of immigrants into our country and it just keeps coming"

Please, put the blame where it belongs. All politicians hold equal blame. It started with Reagan and his amnesty, and has continued for 15+ years with Clinton and Bush. And in case you haven't been paying attention, the DEMOCRATS currently are the majority in congress. Neither party wants to change the status quo, as the Reps. need the labor and the Dems. need the votes.
23

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 03/05/2008 01:24:55
22 SouthernGent;

by all means lets put the blame where it belongs. Every American should know what happened in 1986. Our media has kept us ignorant of it. I read about it in an extensive article at the time when the legislation passed.

There was a lot of talk about immigration reform then as there is now. and people wanted to stop the flow of illegal immigrants. You remember the politicians passing the legislation where they said they would stop all new illegal immigration and give amnesty to those established here.

But here's the details. The House of Representatives was dominated by Democrats. Many of them wanted language in the bill to force employers to check to see if a person was legal or not before hiring. Ronald Reagan strongly supported that idea as well. But the senate was run by the republicans. and the majority leadership of the senate would not allow a bill to pass unless the employers were not required to check if a person was legal or not. The republican leadership in the US Senate would not allow a bill to go through unless the employers only had to photo-copy documents that looked real. It was explained to them that this would lead to a big black market in such documents and that it would mean nothing. Reagan in his 2'nd term had a big problem with dementia, I personally think it was induced by drugs given to him by people around him. But they easily snowed Reagan and got him on board. The House leadership felt they had no choice but to leave that language out as the Senate leadership would not allow it to be voted on. It was really Republican leaders who stabbed us Americans in the back on that. The WSJ article said specifically they had the votes in the Democrat dominated House to pass it as Reagan wanted. Only the Republican leaders of the Senate stopped it.

All the illegals who've come here since 1986 came here because of that. Because the e-verify system we are starting to use now does work and we could've had it
24

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 03/05/2008 01:27:43
All the illegals who've come here since 1986 came here because of that. Because the e-verify system we are starting to use now does work and we could've had it working 20 years ago.

Also, republicans more so than democrats are behind the visa programs. These visa programs bring in indentured servants. Indentured servants are semi-slaves who cannot quit or switch jobs. If they get fired or quit, they go home. In 2006 there was legislation under consideration in the congress that GW Bush supported on immigration reform. The Heritage Foundation analyzed that legislation and said that if it was passed, then it would bring 100 million new legal immigrants in 20 years' time.

The Democrats may not be our friends, but the track record of the republicans on immigration indicates that they are the more hostile of the 2 parties to us.

SouthernGent, I believe in voting people out who do things against us. That's why that Datey fellow says I'm a racist. I'm for the Americans. The people that rule us were never punished for what they did in 1986. They should've all been voted out. We should have institutions that inform our people responsibly on how the voting goes. and yet we don't even have this for our nation.

25

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 03/05/2008 01:38:34
Obama's been picking up some super-delegates they tell us on tv even during this tough time when the liberal media is hammering him.

Today Obama picked up a really big vote of confidence. and that was Ron Paul. Republican presidential candidate and 20-year Republican Congressman Ron Paul was asked on CNN if he would vote for McCain. He said that he would not as McCain is terrible. Then they asked him who he preferred between the 2 Democrats. He said Obama was slightly better.

Thats the thing about Obama. Hilary Clinton can win democrat votes. Obama can win the independents' votes and the democrat votes. In the general election one third of the voters are not loyal to either party. The independent minded right-wingers like Paul would prefer Obama over the other 2.
26

Wally,

By The Rivers Of Babylon (USA) 03/05/2008 04:08:48
a lot of rural people in America get their news from this source here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UC3zjDZUipQ

its called 'red state update'.
27

57Nomad,

california 04/05/2008 22:47:53
#19 Wally

Wally said:

"Thanks to your Republicans Nimrod we've had a huge flood of immigrants into our country and it just keeps comin"

Wally, you need to get rid of the notion that 'everything Wally doesn't like is caused by Republicans.' Wally, I urge you to rejoin the ranks of the literate and avail yourself of some current events. It is the Republicans and the Republicans alone that are trying to stop the mudslide. Who champions the fence? Who keeps shortchanging it? It is you pals the Democrats that are responsible for this and you know it.
28

57Nomad,

california 04/05/2008 22:55:33
#20 Blackbeard

What you say may very well be true. The talking points would be that a 200 dollar steam cleaner is one thing and the steam cleaner that they used that had to be carried in a bigass van is quite another. Plus they (the newly arrived) can't be relied on to move your furniture around without banging it up. Plus, you and anyone else suggesting from afar, take into account that I am not the only one in the house who's in on this decision. I can tell you that while I wouldn't particularly mind a pack of swarthy wetbacks milling around the inside of my house Ms57Nomad, does not, I assure you, share my point of view. Thanks for the thought though.
29

American,

05/05/2008 01:55:02
#19-Wally-Where in Gods's name do you get your info from?? Take a look at the voting records of the dear ole dems in regards to their votes on the immigration reform bill.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.