Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 29th August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Fury as BBC chiefs pick up big bonuses after year of scandals



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 July 2008
THE BBC faced a backlash yesterday when it emerged that top executives received rises of up to 25 per cent after a year of "fake TV" scandals and job cuts.
The corporation's powerful "director of vision", Jana Bennett, saw her pay package leap by £103,000 to £536,000 – though her bonus was officially cut by 40 per cent, after the row over edited documentary footage of The Queen.

According to the annual report, released yesterday, a second executive, Ashley Highfield, the BBC's director of future media and technology, received a £107,000 pay increase to £466,000, despite criticism of an overspend on BBC internet services. She recently left the corporation.

The BBC's director-general, Mark Thompson, defended the pay rises, with nine executive directors getting rises of 17 per cent in basic pay. He waived his own bonus for the fourth year in a row, because of the "scale of disruption and uncertainty" facing BBC colleagues. His own total pay was £816,000 – up from £788,000 the previous year.

"BBC executive benefits are set at a much lower level than most of our equivalents," he said. "When you actually get out into the external world, some potential candidates almost roll on the floor laughing when you talk about potential levels of pay."

But the leading media commentator Adrian Monck, the head of journalism at City University in London, said it was "bizarre" that BBC executives should make more than Britain's Lord Chief Justice, who earns £230,000, or other senior civil or military officials.

"It's deeply odd that the BBC talks about public service in every single thing it does, but when it comes to remuneration it suddenly turns into a rampaging commercial organisation," he said.

In the Netherlands, the culture minister recently proposed that presenters on state television should have their salaries capped to no more than that of the prime minister.

Mr Thompson said yesterday that bonuses were cut by up to 40 per cent to reflect phone scandals and troubles involving the Queen. Trust had returned after the BBC acted decisively, he claimed.

A documentary trailer claimed to show – wrongly – the Queen stalking out of a photoshoot. Separately, faked phone-ins were revealed on Blue Peter and Comic Relief.

Gerry Morrissey, the general-secretary of the broadcasting workers' union, Bectu, said all senior managers at the BBC should have refused to take a bonus this year, as they did last year. He said: "I would remind them that 4,000 jobs have been lost since 2005, yet output has increased, so my members have also taken on additional responsibility."

Ms Bennett is called the most powerful woman in British television, with creative and leadership responsibility for all the corporation's channels. She was criticised in an official BBC report for a "lack of curiosity" over the trailer, which outraged Buckingham Palace. But it was the BBC1 controller, Peter Fincham, who paid for the scandal with his job – though he became ITV's director of television.

Ms Bennett was given a £23,000 bonus, but had increased responsibilities this year, the BBC said.

Jenny Abramsky, the outgoing director of audio and music, still received a £19,000 bonus, despite the fact that the "fake" scandals hit radio as well as TV.

Andy Duncan, the chief executive of Channel 4, earned £1.2 million last year, including a £98,000 bonus and £450,000 in a three-year loyalty scheme.

The ITV chairman, Michael Grade, received a £967,000 bonus last year, on top of his £813,000 salary.


The full article contains 603 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 09 July 2008 12:44 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: The BBC
 
1

DouglasT,

09/07/2008 01:12:49
If they want their finance to equate to commercial companies then they should make the BBC commercial and allow us to choose to pay for it or not. Paying for a licence under threat with no input to how the money is spent is Mugabe-style democracy.
2

Guga II,

Rockall 09/07/2008 01:27:23
It is long past time that they scrapped the iniquitous television tax and made the EBC compete on the open market.

Stealing nearly £5 million of taxpayers money for a bunch of executive directors is ridiculous.

If anyone wants to keep the EBC as it is, then they should change it to an encrypted subscription service, and stop stealing every increasing amounts of money from the taxpayers.

I know we won't get much support from the MPs at Westmiddenster for this, as they all claim for their television tax, and their Sky Television subscriptions on their thieving, dodgy expense claims.

The sooner Scotland is independent, the sooner we will be rid of the thieves at Westmiddenster, and the sooner we will be rid of the thieves at the EBC.

3

Jay Kay,

09/07/2008 07:25:48
I simply refuse to own or have a TV in the house, my wife and I both agree that paying this ransom each year to the EBC is unacceptable, we therefore choose not to have TV and I would encourage more people to do the same.

This is scandalous at a time when the lowest paid workers in this country, nurses, care assistants are being paid peanuts, these greedy pigs whole heartedly accept more money in the form of a rise than the care assistants make.

The nulab fatcats would approve im sure, bunch of scumbags themselves. The lot of them need to be put up against the wall.
4

Proximaking,

Aberdeen 09/07/2008 07:45:07
Come the revolution these people will be first up against the wall. They produce dross and should be paid dross. Pay peanuts and you get monkeys comes to mind, so since we already know they are monkeys why not pay them accordingly.
5

sam the god,

09/07/2008 08:06:30
These thieving fat cats even have the cheek to charge blind people half price for a television licence they are in the same league as the snout merchants in Westminster if not worse.
6

JayJay,

Right here 09/07/2008 08:26:10
It is now a boardroom cliche to trot out the tired old "we need to pay vast salaries to attract the best" canard. This maxim appears to apply no matter the shambles you create.
Already this year we have read that the City whizz kids were paid bonuses of £17bn. Money well spent when you see the shambles they have created in the financial markets so far in 2008. Or the mighty board at RBS, paid millions to lead the bank full square into the same sub prime morass as every other bank in the UK. Or indeed the board at Northern Rock, handsomely rewarded for bankrupting their bank.
There are no sanctions for failure at a corporate level. Huge bonuses whatever the weather, all delivered in the standard, now boring, "you need to pay this to get the best".
Trouble is that when a crisis hits, these guys are shown to be no better than bog standard and really unbecoming of their vast pay. That such a culture of flawed logic now seeps through the public sector just takes the biscuit. How can you be bonus'ed for spending a budget?
7

donald,

glasgow 09/07/2008 08:29:35
Will the "Scottish" Labour Party Secretary be complaining abut this?
8

Cauchy Riemann,

Wales 09/07/2008 08:31:01
BBC executive pay has been rising well over inflation for quite a few years now - this present hike isn't a blip.

"If they want their finance to equate to commercial companies then they should make the BBC commercial and allow us to choose to pay for it or not."

True.

The compulsory licence fee is outdated in this present era. According to the BBC itself most people want its funding model changed to reflect freedom of choice.

Those supporting the present compulsory system have a hint of religious mania about them.

Taliban: "We believe so strongly that women should be covered. Our beliefs are so strong that we deprive them of freedom to choose in this matter. In fact even if the majority disagree it doesn't matter - our belief is so important."

BBC drones: "We believe so strongly in the BBC. Our beliefs are so strong that we deprive people freedom of choice in this matter. In fact even if the majority disagree it doesn't matter - our belief is so important"

People should be free to pay or not pay for this service. Its not as if the BBC is somehow different from commercial TV.
9

Boy Wonder,

09/07/2008 08:43:22
Perhaps, now that TV programmes can be downloaded to your computer, we can give up TV and stop paying the Telly Tax?? Or will we be taxed for having home computers that can download TV progs next?

On another note .... the old man across the road from me fought in a world war that took his father and brothers. His family are all gone now ... and he has a paltry pension that barely keeps him. He can barely afford to eat and live with food and power bills rising so fast. His pension increase won't pay for them, bacause that piddling amount he gets is a farce. I don't think my neighbour will last another year. He lives on a damn sight less than 10K a year. Most pensioners and disbled do.

So can someone tell me why these people get such enormously high levels of pay, when there is still a great deal of poverty in this country?




10

yockel,

09/07/2008 08:52:51
#3 Jay Kay, I bet you cost the BBC more money than they get from a license payer due to all the threatening junk mail Capita Business Services Ltd send you posturing as TV Licensing.
11

McMillar,

London 09/07/2008 10:08:17
There is no place for a licence fee model these days. Amazing we still pay and full credit to those who remove the tv and just get on with it. With the entertainment available by download or sky /bt vision or similar it’s crazy having to pay for a service you may use < 10% of the time. If they sold TVs with no bbc channels and were exempt from the fee I’m sure they would sell out.
12

JoeMiddleton,

Edinburgh 09/07/2008 10:21:49
Time for an SBC. We don't get good value for the TV licence contribution Scotland makes and we could do a lot better spending the money ourselves.
13

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 09/07/2008 10:39:35
This just goes to prove that no bad deed goes unrewarded - to an obscene degree.

Boy Wonder

Your story about your pensioner neighbour was touching and one hopes that his neighbours help him out with their garden produce and in other ways.

HE certainly deserves financial support while those incompetents and arrogant b*stards at the BBC should be thrown out on their ar*es for GROSS INCOMPETENCE and general stupidity.
14

terry osser,

morden 09/07/2008 10:58:33
nulab organisation so behavior is to be expected. nulab very good at enriching themselves
15

wattie>x 1,

PLYMOUTH 09/07/2008 14:12:03
Outside off the lying, corrupt, gravy train plunderers in Blair and Brown's New Labour Party, the BBC runs them to a short head in the gravy train plunder stakes.
How the licence payers have put up wth the sheer, shameless arrogance of the obscenity shown by both for so long, will remain a lifetime mystery.
If the judiciary was democratic and just; many from both of these corrupt outfits would be languishing in one of the Queen of England comfortable prisons.
16

Sedov,

Scotland 09/07/2008 16:32:58
These media fat cats are only following the example of the failed city bankers and politicians. Leave them alone, after all there is money to be made from tv gaffs.
17

Jay Kay,

09/07/2008 17:00:36
#10 Yockel, you have no idea, after several very threatening letters cunningly disguised as a reminder that we did NOT have a tv licence, my wife, a doctor at Ninewells finally phoned them and invited them round for tea and an offer to inspect our premises, she backed it up with a letter from our solicitor if they didnt stop harrasing us, then they would be on the end of a court order.

We havent had a reply, but the threatening letters dried up, Pathetic.
18

Jock MacSprog,

09/07/2008 19:54:41
the only thing surprising about this is that we all continue to put up with it. We really are sheep in this country. We just keep dutifully paying our tv tax to finance these fat cats. These idiots make more than govt ministers, and most company directors. This is the true face of champagne socialism that exists in this sick sick country.
19

Jock MacSprog,

09/07/2008 19:55:37
16, the big difference is that the City fat cats are being paid by the shareholders and private money. The BBC fat cats are being paid by the TAXPAYER.
20

Banana Heid,

Ayrshire 09/07/2008 22:33:39
Pigs, Snouts , Trough...

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.