Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Drink Driving, Don't Risk It!

Minister pledges to listen to the voice of the nation

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 November 2007
THE sea is an extremely important resource for Scotland. Our waters contain some of the best fishing grounds in the world, North Sea oil has been worth billions of pounds and marine energy brings the promise of a new economic dawn.
The fish farm industry has grown rapidly in recent years and wildlife tourism is also becoming increasingly important.

For all of these reasons, it is vital we ensure the health of the marine environment on which most of this depends and over the past month The Scotsman has been setting out how and why this should be done.

The Scottish Government has responded positively to our Save Our Seas campaign, which calls for a network of marine reserves to be created round the coast as part of a package of measures we believe are necessary, but its warm words will now be put to the test.

Over the next few months, politicians and officials will have to work on the concrete proposals for the Marine Bill that will make it a truly worthwhile piece of legislation.

So far, just over 1,000 coupons and e-mails of support for Save Our Seas have been sent in by the public.

And yesterday, as The Scotsman presented the coupons to Richard Lochhead, the Scottish environment secretary, he spoke of his determination to bring in "ambitious and meaningful legislation".

"I pay tribute to The Scotsman campaign which has clearly been vindicated by the number of members of the public who have expressed their support for protecting our precious marine environment," he said.

"I have no doubt that those who have replied to The Scotsman campaign speak for the nation and I recognise the Scottish Government's role is to respond to this challenge.

"I am determined to use the months ahead to prepare the ground for ambitious and meaningful legislation.

"No sensible person who cares about the future of the marine environment wants a half-cocked, incomplete bill."

As laid out in our campaign manifesto, The Scotsman believes this means a network of marine reserves or protected areas should be created around the coast to safeguard rare and important forms of life and places of particularly rich biodiversity.

There should also be a system of marine spatial planning to organise our use of the sea in the best possible way - ensuring that human activities are in the best places and can co-exist, rather than destroy, sealife - and a marine management organisation to oversee it.

A good Marine Bill will be an all-encompassing piece of legislation that largely replaces the myriad of rules and regulations from different acts of parliament which currently apply.

But it should not simply speed up the process for new developments or become a "manifesto for further exploitation of the sea".

A key test will be whether the bill contains ways to measure the health of the marine ecosystem to ensure we are living within the sea's environmental limits and take steps to adjust our behaviour if this is not the case.

Calum Duncan, marine task force convener for umbrella body Scottish Environment LINK, said: "We commend The Scotsman for an inspiring campaign that has resonated with people throughout the country and helped inform an important debate on the future of our world-class seas.

"We welcome the ambition of the Cabinet secretary for a bill that really delivers win-win solutions for Scotland's seas and coastal communities.

"In order to do so, protection, restoration and enhancement of Scotland's marine environment must be the priority for the bill, through delivery of marine planning, a lead marine organisation, nationally important marine areas and marine ecosystem objectives."

Jonny Hughes, head of policy at the Scottish Wildlife Trust (SWT), said: "Richard Lochhead's commitment to an 'ambitious and meaningful' Scottish Marine Bill reflects a welcome step forward and is very much in line with growing public opinion.

"The bill will finally give Scotland the opportunity to move away from blinkered short-termism, unchecked damage and over-exploitation, towards a vision of abundant and thriving seas we can all benefit from, and be rightly proud of."

Dr Becky Boyd, marine policy officer for SWT, said: "Even without extended powers, there is a great deal the government can do to rise to this challenge.

"A Scottish Marine Bill that steps up to the plate of public demand will include a statutory marine planning system with national leadership and local participation in local plans, marine protected areas for Scotland's marine treasures, strong links with fisheries planning and most importantly, an explicit commitment to ensure that marine eco- system health underpins decision-making."

Scotland's fishermen are widely recognised as the most environmentally friendly in Europe. But the alarming decline of cod stocks in some of the world's best fishing grounds underlines the need to take conservation seriously.

Cod stocks have recently shown signs of a recovery and our fishermen yesterday announced a step-up of the voluntary scheme to temporarily close areas of sea where too many juvenile cod are being caught, by raising the size of fish triggering the shutdown from 35 to 50 centimetres. The scheme is the first of its kind in Europe and a demonstration of the increasing sense of agreement between Scotland's fishermen and environmentalists.

Bertie Armstrong, the chief executive of the Scottish Fishermen's Federation, stressed the scheme was just "one strand in a whole bundle of positive, proactive initiatives to make sure that the cod recovery now under way takes real hold".

"Innovative changes to net components, verification of cod avoidance by use of an observer programme and development of coherent strategies by area are all part of the Scottish fishing industry's much wider approach to sustainable fishing," he said.

A Marine Bill should help this drive to achieve a sustainable catch by increasing the health of the eco-system as a whole.

And if the waters become healthier and life more abundant, there is no reason why our fleet should not be able to catch more fish than at present.

We have much to gain from the seas and by managing them sensibly they will remain a hugely valuable resource for future generations.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 November 2007 10:21 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Save our Seas
 
1

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 09/11/2007 00:59:49

-- The fish farm industry has grown rapidly in recent years

Only massive subsidy keeps this criminal activity going. The ecology of the west coast of Scotland has been trashed. Show me a sea trout? Maybe on the north coast where fish-caging hasn't quite reached. YET.

Our? Whose? Am I paid a dividend on it?

Next it will be OUR mountains.

Which is strange for I never in any way felt I owned them.

2

,

09/11/2007 01:59:29
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 1128139, Article id was mapped to record!
3

jj,

09/11/2007 02:16:03

Define "pledge".

4

SouthernSkye,

09/11/2007 06:45:34

#3 - A rival to Mr Sheene ! ;-)

5

Boy Wonder,

09/11/2007 06:56:28

#2. A very fine little ditty, Scunnert. May you always have an aspiring handy for your next 'haddock'!!! :))

6

Boy Wonder,

09/11/2007 08:28:11

#2. I meant *aspirin*.

7

whatsyourname,

09/11/2007 08:41:00

No way they are saying something good about Scotland........

8

thinking,

Scotland 09/11/2007 08:41:55

As long as the UK is part of the EU then there is little hope of achieving success with many of these plans.
The EU does not have Britains interests as a priority.
Far from it. Those in charge in Brussels would prefer to subjugate us, something they failed in during two world wars.

9

Olav,

Maryhill 09/11/2007 09:08:27

Main priority should be use of seas for trade (the economy!), which has always been its main function and benefit to humankind. Over 90% of UK trade moves by sea, yet there is no mention of this fact in the marine bill! Ships use the seas, as do ducks and fish, though this seems news to the environmentalists looking out of their Chinese made binocs, travelling in Korean-built cars, dressed in Indian-made clothes, eating Latin American fruit slurped down with Assie wine. When you look at shelves in any shop, think ship, think sea!

10

jdships,

09/11/2007 09:20:26

3. jj Define "pledge".

" To make a solemn promise (to do something)."
So this could, I repeat could, just be a political first !
However, Richard Lochead is quoted as saying
"I am determined to use the months ahead to prepare the ground for ambitious and meaningful legislation."


In other words "if I wait long enough it will get forgotten about" or at best be years down the road before anything really happens
Don't hold your breath on this one

EU has the Scottish fishing industry by the "proverbials "

11

johnwg711,

London 09/11/2007 09:25:32

Hold on Scotland! Don't put your foot through the bottom of your boat!
Scotland has the major share of wave and tidal resources that can be used by new benign power generation technologies (many of which have been developed by Scottish companies). Don't close off useful wave and tidal areas (especially the latter) by declaring them a "marine park" which would preclude those areas being used to generate electrical power and revenue for Scotland.

12

SEUMAS,

Tain 09/11/2007 11:06:20

Will the area of sea near the border which was stolen by Westminster be returned to Scottish jurisdiction, remember Tam of the Binns was heavily involved??

13

weeshooie,

Livingston 09/11/2007 11:14:42

Well said No 12. that was the point i was about to make!!!!
will the first minister ensure that the 60,000 square miles of Scottish fishing waters are returned to Scotland with the same speed they were stolen by England 6 months before the quotas for Scotland were reduced by 50% compliments of the totally inept Ross Finnie.

14

The Bruce2,

Edinburgh 09/11/2007 11:28:43

That will be a first.

15

bythesea,

09/11/2007 12:10:51

a system of marine spatial planning to organise our use of the sea in the best possible way AND not ..... become a "manifesto for further exploitation of the sea".

are both key statements and this will ONLY be achieved if the entire process is TRULY inclusive and not just another exercise to ensure commercial interests have a 'legal' framework for further exploitation.

As a by the by - this whole thing around 'green' fisheries - cod may be an emotive species but over 500 million fish / yr of other species are killed as by-catch in Scottish waters.

Most stocks, from cod to wolffish, are either unsustainable or bordering on it; the Clyde nephrops fishery has essentially wiped out the stocks of fish in it; the squid fishery has just about wiped out the Moray Firth.

Only when an independent authority can come out and say it has determined that stocks of fish in the Clyde, Moray Firth, Solway Firth etc have recovered to be in the same 'rude health' as Berties beloved nephrops, can they be seen as realing addressing conservation issues.

www.ssacn.org

16

The Master,

09/11/2007 12:53:38

82. Evan Owen, Upper Gumtree / 12:38pm 9 Nov 2007
Is Mr Darling a Scottish person?
Is Mrs Brown one too?
If Scottishland was independent they would lose thir fancy jobs in London, they would have to put up with being in Edinburgh full time, it is evident that wouldn't be too happy with that, why? Is it such a dour place? Is it as bad as Gwynedd in Wales? Are the nationalists so blinded with the prospect of power that common sense goes out the window, assuming there is any in the first place of course.

What about the demagogue Salmond? Isn’t he the only politician who currently has a dual Westminster/Holyrood mandate? Why was he so keen to stay in London before his almost messianic return to Scotland as FM? Why is he immune from criticism of politicians who just love Wesminster? Come to that, it is quite common for Scots of working age to spend a considerable amount of time in London for business reasons but to maintain a home in Scotland. Why take it out on politicians, just because they don’t support the SNP’s increasingly untenable and ludicrous independence agenda?

By the way, even you Nutty Nats have probably twigged by now that rumours of my demise on the RBS thread were greatly exaggerated last night! Like my Dr Who namesake, I always manage to resurrect myself. This just shows that none of the Tartan Taliban supporters' predictions ever come true!

17

,

09/11/2007 14:22:22
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 1129787, Article id was mapped to record!
18

morris,

Edinburgh 09/11/2007 14:45:07

16

Edinburgh was recently voted the most desireable place in the UK to reside.

It is one of the most spectacular cities in the world and hosts the largest festival of arts anywhere.It was called the Greatest show on earth by PJ Barnum no less.

Why dont you visit it and see for yourself.I assume you have never done so, (as opposed to need your eyes tested).

Salmond was voted policitician of the year at Westminster.Obviously that ecaped your attention also.

I am grateful however for these comments of yours.
It saves SNP members having to justify their position ,when they can draw attention to contributions like yours. Why do you bother? You cannot possibly gain anything from it!

19

The Master,

09/11/2007 15:24:50

18. morris, Edinburgh / 2:45pm 9 Nov 2007

#18 Morris: I actually have a second home in Edinburgh, so what’s your point exactly? I wouldn’t live there if I didn’t like the place. In fact, I hope that the good people of Edinburgh opt to remain within Britain if (God forbid) the Tartan Taliban ever get their way! We all know that the SNP are anti Edinburgh, so less of it please! Until the protest vote at the last Scottish Elections, their representation in Edinburgh was nothing short of derisory.

Salmond’s a master of the political arts: well ain’t that jolly! He must be the only effective Nat politician ever (if anyone who purports to push a ridiculous and discredited independence agenda can ever truly be called effective!) Thanks for the literary criticism: this is really touching, coming as it does from someone whose views are so stereotypically divisive and full of overblown grievances that you may actually be an “Alf Garnett” type satire written by some unionist troll!

20

GP,

09/11/2007 17:36:08

8# surely a typo, no?
Briatin has not shown that Britain or Scotland's interests are at it's heart.
scotland has to stand up even if it means on it's own and show that we will not stand for this uneven handedness to continue.

21

bythesea,

09/11/2007 18:47:20

In many ways I pity Alex Salmond - not only does he have to fight hard to get his SNP message across to those who may not be natural supporters, but he has to do it against the background chattering of members / supporters who appear to want to alienate everyone.

#8 Many members of the EU fought on the side of the allies in both world wars and many died and you spout that load of rubbish - missing link.

22

morris,

Edinburgh 10/11/2007 09:18:39

8

What do you think has been happening from Westminster?
Your own brain should tell you that when a nation of 5 million joins with a nation of 60 million or so,then it cannot possibly be to her advantage long term.The Mps elected in England would be failing to do their jobs if they did not secure the best deal for the area that elected them.The same would no doubt be true in principle for the EU ,but at least there is a unity of purpose there ,in that there are many small nations who can collectively counter the larger and therefore less numerous ones.On pure arithmetical principle alone it is the opposite of what you describe which happens here.
The problem with the UK is that Scotland Wales and Northern Ireland are NOT too small to be independent (nowhere is) but they are too small to ever get a fair deal with England as a partner which is bigger than the other three combined.

London has more Mps than Scotland does ! You could argue that this is correct in that it reflects her population,but you only have to look at the money that is allocated to the South East and the denisty of population to see what happens !Its a case of mind over matter. South of Watford they dont mind,north of watford we dont matter.
Scotland of course can claim independence because she was formerly a nation, but the regions of England might not be so readily recognised of course.Would Wessex be recognised because she was once a kingdom? Im not sure.Scotland however is not in debate as she survives as an identifiable nation.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.