Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Cuts could take haddock off the menu

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
20 October 2007
SCOTTISH fishermen could be facing a cut of up 15 per cent in their mainstay catch of haddock next year, it was revealed yesterday.
And influential marine scientists on the advisory committee of the International Council for the Exploration of the Seas (ICES) are also calling for substantial cuts in North Sea herring and mackerel catches.

But, in a major boost for the Scottish fishing industry, the experts are also recommending that cod stocks in the North Sea can be fished sustainably for the first time in six years.

ICES, which has recommended a zero catch of cod since 2001, is now recommending a 50 per cent cut on this year's quotas to be set as a landings limit in 2008. The final total allowable catch (TAC) figures for next year will not be finally set until the December meeting of European fisheries ministers.

But Bertie Armstrong, the chief executive of the Scottish Fishermen's Federation, said yesterday that, as a starting point for the negotiations, the advice from ICES could result in a reasonable return for fishermen in 2008.

He said: "The portion of the advice which stands out most clearly is that for North Sea cod. After six years of advising zero catch the position now is that cod can be rebuilt quickly.

"This is excellent news, reflecting scientific proof of what the fishermen had been reporting for some time - that cod was recovering in the North Sea. If this year class (juvenile cod) is allowed to pass into the adult stock then it will rebuild very quickly."

He continued: "Advice for other stocks of importance to the Scottish industry reflects what should be expected of a dynamic, interdependent ecosystem - some species are doing well, others less so.

"The haddock stock is completely sustainable but this year the indications are that there should be 15 per cent reduction in the TAC. Mackerel is also subject to a management plan and the indications are that a downturn in the catch will be recommended - somewhere in the order of 9 per cent.

"The herring stock is also a good size, but for reasons genuinely unexplained, which do not include overfishing, there has been a downturn in recruitment for five years in a row now and for that reason a reduction in fishing in the order of 30 to 35 per cent is being recommended."

In the report ICES scientists state that the number of young cod in the North Sea has shown a slight rise for the second year in a row.

The report states: "Despite the fact that recovery measures have been in place since 2002, the potential for rebuilding the stock in recent years has been poor . The 2005 year class (juvenile cod) is somewhat larger and provides a rebuilding opportunity. A year class of this magnitude was last observed six years ago."

A spokesman for RSPB Scotland said the ICES advice painted a "stark picture" of several key EU fish stocks.

And Mark Ruskell, the organisation's marine officer, declared: "It's important that the sacrifices industry have made in the past are not blown by demands to increase the numbers of cod removed from the sea, regardless of whether they are landed or discarded.

"Measures to avoid catching young cod by industry are welcome, but they are still largely experimental pilots that need to be adopted across the board.

"The cod born in 2005 must be protected at all costs if we are to see long term recovery and an end to the economic roller coaster ride the fishing industry has been on for years."

EU TARGETS FOREIGN FISHING PIRATES

THE European Commission has unveiled plans for a major crackdown on illegal fishing by "pirate" trawlers operating in European waters and the seas around the globe.

Illegal catches by vessels involved in illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing are estimated to have a worldwide turnover of £7 billion a year, with imports into Europe conservatively estimated at 500,000 tonnes and valued at more than £700 million.

But Joe Borg, the European Fisheries Commissioner, is calling for a zero-tolerance policy by European member states to the high-seas lawbreakers by bringing in measures which would allow access to the EU market only to fisheries products that have been certified as legal by the countries where vessels are registered, or the exporting state concerned.

A European blacklist of IUU vessels and of states which turn a blind eye to IUU activities would be set up and deterrent sanctions introduced against IUU activities in EU waters. Mr Borg declared: "There must be zero tolerance for pirate fishing which rewards only those who steal fish resources."

SCOTSMAN'S MANIFESTO TO PROTECT THE SEAS

THE Scotsman has launched a campaign for urgent steps to be taken to protect our precious marine life.

We want:

• a network of marine reserves and protected areas to be created to safeguard marine sites.

• a system of marine planning, effectively zoning areas for appropriate use, to safeguard important fishing grounds from other developments.

• a single marine management organisation for Scottish waters to ensure this system operates efficiently.

• Scotland to be given control of the 200-mile conservation boundary with international waters. Currently the Scottish Government controls out to 12 miles

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 October 2007 10:35 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Save our Seas
 
1

Sean K,

Edinburgh 20/10/2007 03:15:30

Scotsman manifesto to protect the seas :

1. Marine reserves and sanctuaries have to be locally approved and locally managed. Otherwise we give enormous power over coastal economies to WWF Greenpeace and anti-harvesting groups none of whom have understanding of or sympathy for fishers and farmers.

2. Marine planning systems must a priori have the stakeholdersa fully involved in the decision making and evidence gathering process. Otherwise it will become a top-down 'we know best' system.

3. A single Scottish management organisation would be welcomed. but again the stakeholders and coastal communties must be fully represented.

4. Scotland to control its own 200 mile EEZ. Now you're talking ! This is by far the best of the Scotsman's Manifesto ideas.

With the provisos on 1, 2, and 3, may the Scotsman campaign succeed !

2

Cynic,

Dalkeith 20/10/2007 03:19:53

Let's do what Iceland did in the 70's. Boot the foreigners out.

3

Boy Wonder,

20/10/2007 06:08:04

Let the fish stocks recover!! Eat meat or poultry instead or go vegetarian for a while. There's probably plenty frozen fish stocked away to last a year.

4

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 20/10/2007 07:08:57

Scottish skippers spent their own money and time developing conservation-minded gear which is now used by all the remaining fleet. There is very little lift of immature fish. The quote system means alot of eatable and valuable fish gets dumped back in the sea from here to the arctic circle.

The nature of fish is that they SWIM. To where there's food and where they feel happy.

We now need nationally regulated and patroled fishing waters. All fishers are against the unworkable common fisheries policy. Bilateral agreements between fishing nations do work and can be reviewed and negociated annually as fish stocks and movements change.

5

Sqidward,

20/10/2007 07:39:28

#4 Unwashed bagged salads are the way to go. Literally!

6

Chuck Vindaloo,

20/10/2007 08:08:37

Fave New York restaurant 'Meat Without Feet'.

7

morris,

Edinburgh 20/10/2007 08:41:14

I would like to hear what the fishermen themselves have to say.We all have an opinion ,but thats a quite different matter to knowing the inside story!

It has been suggested to me that whilst stocks of Cod are certainly reduced and only now beginning to stage a recovery, stocks of haddock were never that seriously depleted,and yet the haddock which is popular in Scotland(it shows when you buy a fish supper on both sides of the border)is also restricted.Is it the case that all fishing is restricted because it needs to be,or is it the case that all fishing is restricted and once again we have a London imposed solution to what is largely a Scottish problem,but we have no control over it of course.

It is now common knowledge that Westminster was prepared to sacrifice the Scottish fishing industry in order to secure deals from the EU in other areas.That alone should serve as a clear indication why trusting Westminster to look after Scotland's affairs is an absolute folly!

8

Tweedmouth,

20/10/2007 08:55:39

#1 - Sean K
"Scotland to control its own 200 mile EEZ. Now you're talking !."

Great idea! Problem is that those waters were signed away to the EEC by Edward Heath - who lied to Parliament about it for 30 years. The ONLY way the UK could get back its waters would be complete withdrawal from the EU - like Norway and Iceland. None of the three major parties in the UK, nor the SNP in Scotland, is remotely willing to contemplate leaving the EU.

If you retreat to the 'wee scotlander' position: "it's waur fish" just remember that:

1. Scotlant is NOT an independent state and therefore has no territorial rights to sea or land anywhere in the UK's boundaries.

2. If an SNP government ever put an independence referendum to the electorate in Scotland (not - NOT 'The Scottish People') - they would lose. But even if they did win such a referendum, they would have to apply to become members of the EU - whose subsidies and handouts the nationalist strategy pivots on once the £30 billion subsidy from England was gone. So if a newly independent Scotland, with 6 million voters went can in hand to the EU, do you think they would have ANY negotiating leverage against giant fishing nations like Spain, France, Holland or Denmark?

The reality is that Europe dictates which nations get to fish our historic territorial waters and the ONLY way to get control back would be if the UK as a whole voted to leave the EU and ENFORCE territorial control using the British Navy and Royal Airforce.
This would no doubt entail a low level war similar to the Icelandic cod wars, but it might be far more serious than that.

Meanwhile the Braveheart, tartan blinkered nationalist romantics can dream all they want, but it won't save a single herring or sandeel for Scottish boats. Brussels rules, and don't you forget it.

9

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 20/10/2007 09:10:00

Trawling (or any means of sea fishing) will always get a mixed bag whatever species you're targetting. Modern gear lets most immature fish escape.

We think industial fishing for sand eels did (and does?) the most damage to the North Sea ecology and that much norwegian pout landed was ficticious. Any sort of young fish was in the soup that went for fishmeal.

Perhaps some zones could be closed at certain times of year. It costs alot to keep a boot tied up under the present monthly restrictions.

10

bythesea,

20/10/2007 09:33:53

In the past scientific evidence has been ignored when it called for cuts - politicians and commercial fishermen just decided to act in self interest.

Everyone was cock-a-hoop because the scientists said recently that are not recommending a zero catch in cod, so they believe scientists.

Now scientists are saying there may need to be cuts in mackerel, herring and haddock -- how will the politicians and commercial fishermen respond ???

And keep an eye out for the recommendations on megrim, whiting, blue whiting.

One thing is for sure, with all its attendant bycatch - discard levels, nothing will be allowed to stop the west coast nephrops fleet from turning the Clyde into a fishless 'desert'.

www.ssacn.org

11

Shellfishfarmer,

Inverness 20/10/2007 09:36:02

#1 Sean K. Obviously local communities have to be major stakeholders, but not the major stakeholders. The major stakeholder is the marine environment without whose robust health we are all whistling in the dark. Putting fishery management over entirely to the fisherman is like putting the fox in charge of the hen coup.

Already there is evidence of the unbalanced way this works. The North Sea Regional Advisory Committee, chaired by a fisherman, with fishermen in the majority has just rejected scientific advice on herring quotas. Quelle surprise!

The best way of dealing with this issue is to accept the precautionary principle, put large areas outside any exploitation by fishery concerns, and have the patience to wait for the positive results.

12

Shellfishfarmer,

Inverness 20/10/2007 09:40:06

Not sure of my facts here, but marine reserves declared under the environment directives, would immediately have the effect of putting the areas outside the CFP regime. In other words the Westminster Marine Bill together with a Scottish version, if it comes, would do the trick.

13

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 20/10/2007 10:52:21

It was the "pirate" foreign fishing fleets that ruined the cod fishing off the Grand Banks in the North Atlantic of Canada and it will take years for the cod stock to replenish.

These pirate countries should be heavily fined and their fishing fleets and boats and fishermen jailed.

It HAS been done in Canada and did send a strong message to certain countries that care only for taking as much as possible for their own greedy gains.

They care not one penny for anybody but themselves and are profligate in the waste by using improper nets and unsustainable practices.

14

Yok Finney,

Ross-shire 20/10/2007 11:08:59

-- commercial fishermen just decided to act in self interest

.. as do fish, prawns, crabs etc.

Our self interest would be to co-operate in regional sectors as to what gear and methods are allowed; set open and closed seasons; employ our own scientists.

15

Paul W,

On dry land 20/10/2007 12:30:27

#8 It's not down to London or Westminster (Scots PM, Scots Chancellor etc), but Brussels. It is easy for a parochial person to blame the UK Parliament for every wrong that befalls Scotland, but you should really look to Brussels.

The UK has to negotiate against 26 other countries. Inevitably there will be compromises, but I doubt whether a few haddock will make a difference here or there.

If you want your fish back you haveto get out of both the UK and the EU. If you vote SNP you might achieve one, for whatit's worth, but you will never achieve the other. Don't believe that a small country like Scotland will be able to haggle with the EU over fish quotas. If the UK can't win then Scotland on its own never will.

16

Sanny,

Glasgow 20/10/2007 12:36:37

9. Tweedmouth: -
You’re talking nonsense! If or, more properly, WHEN the referendum on Independence comes Scotland will vote, as it did before, with a 75% majority in favour. Only this time we wont allow the "40% of the electoral roll" fudge; an electoral role that included dead people, those who had left the country , moved or simply shouldn’t have been on the register anyway.

On gaining independence, Scotland and the rest of the British countries, will continue in membership of the EU but will have the right to withdraw if they so choose. The government of an independent Scotland would have to re-negotiate their position in the EU then put that position to the people of Scotland. Unlike England, Sovereignty in Scotland rests with the people not the Crown or parliament.

Iceland does not seem to need a large force to enforce it’s rights, so why should Scotland? As I recall, and I’m old enough to do just that, We were the ones who fought Iceland over the fishing grounds and despite our superior forces - WE LOST. And rightly so!!

Nonetheless Tweedmouth; keep your illiterate racist Bigmouth going – it will help to convince a few more of my fellow Scots to push for independence.

As I travel a great deal in Iberia I note that immature fish are often on the menu – so much for EU policing of our waters.

17

Newfie Jim,,

Mobile, Newfoundland,canada 20/10/2007 14:36:13

#14 Tim. Right on b'y. but unfortunately they are still on the nose n tail of the Grand Banks and the same ships,boats (whatever) are being caught in the act with undersized nets and undersized fish in their holds. The ship owners country

18

Newfie Jim,,

Mobile, Newfoundland,canada 20/10/2007 14:40:03

ship owners country just let them off and they return to fish in the same manner time n again. We had problems with the Spanish fleet and they still are doing the same thing on the nose n tail of the Grand Banks which is in international waters. Really stupid.

19

Newfie Jim,,

Mobile, Newfoundland,canada 20/10/2007 14:46:45

#19. I agree with your last paragraph. when Newfoundlanders used cod traps and hand lines there was a way for a fisherman to earn a living.A very hard living but still a living. Its all gone now. Newfoundlanders are off to alberta or ontario in hordes n droves . Our hope now is in the oil resources that have been discovered on the Banks but unfortunately again . Newfoundland doesn't own them anymore the Federal Government in Ottawa does and they don't give a damn about fishermen here.

20

bythesea,

20/10/2007 14:52:11

#18 You may find many other industrial sectors objecting greatly to withdrawing from the EU given that the amount they receive in subsidies which are far greater than all the catching sectors put together contribute to the economy.

As for enforcement, it's not an EU role, it's devolved to the Scottish Government & every year the SFPA find over 1000 breaches of regulations, yet prosecute less than 1% of them.

#15 Would you restrict membership of these regional groups to commercial fishermen only ? If so, how would you see any form of independent 'check and balance' being performed ?

21

bythesea,

20/10/2007 14:57:46

#19 The big difference between farmers and fishermen is that farmers have to sow, nature and tend to their crops and harvest them when they are mature and ready.

Too many fishing fleets do not understand this basic concept of resource management.

22

nolimits,

British Columbia 20/10/2007 16:25:18

Newfie Jim:
As a young man back in the early 60's, I worked on a side dragger out of Halifax. The sheer number of Spanish, Polish, Russian etc. fishing fleets with "mother ships" was amazing. Grand, Green, and Brown Banks, were so crowded that we 'locals' could not get a catch worth the name. I left after 3 successive trips in which I owed the company money for grub etc. because my share was non existent. I could see the writing on the wall even back then. The same is happening with the salmon on the west coast. Hardly a Fraser River run this year. Now Fisheries are talking about shutting down the catch. About time! ANY fool could have seen 10 years ago that this was going to happen, but the gov't types 'know it all' and ignore the warning signs. Too bad....what a waste of a precious resource.

23

Grouse,

Canada 20/10/2007 16:51:55

Grey squirrels eat all seafoods.

24

Alexander the Scot,

Michigan U.S.A. 20/10/2007 17:50:10

21. 22. 23, 25-NO LIMITS.

Congratulations. I have looked at all the other postings on this subject and it's obvious in my humble opinion that you are the only one qualified to comment so far. It would be good if some career fishermen in Scotland would give information to we who know NOTHING of what is happening their input also.

25

just chat,

London 20/10/2007 20:28:35

2# as an immigrant from the med i also agree with you entirely, if other nations have overfished their sea what gives them the right to take ours?

i rebember long ago on the BBC? that the Danes where using nets so small they where catching fish under half an inch long! n using it for fertilizer!!!!

soon after we joined the EEC a Danish MP boarded a fishing vessel that came to fish in britishterritorial waters mn said arrest me if you DARE! yes i would have arrested him n the entire crew of the fishing vessel iligally fishing in our waters,

i am a liberal BUT that don't mean we should give up our fish to people who never had the political will to concerve their stocks,

they want our fish? sure NP they can buy from our fishemen!

26

Displaced Scot,

UK 20/10/2007 21:31:14

The SNP loves the EU, the EU is doing this to Scottish fishermen. The Common Fisheries Policy should be abolished as far as Scotland and the rest of the UK is concerned.
On the South Coast, the fishermen of Hastings have to watch the French catch all the Cod as they have most of the quota.
So SNP the EU is not so great now.

27

tassiestag,

tasmania 21/10/2007 08:30:03

its the same in the great southern ocean the fish stocks all around antarctica are being decimated by illegal fishing........huge boats with huge mother ships......they stay down there for months...........sink the buggers i say.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.