Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Botha ban upheld as De Villiers blasts media

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 July 2009
SOUTH Africa lock Bakkies Botha has lost his appeal against a two-week ban. The Blue Bulls forward was cited for a dangerous charge on Lions prop Adam Jones during last Saturday's second Test in Pretoria.
It left the Welshman with a dislocated shoulder, and he has now flown home for further treatment. Botha's appeal was heard via conference call yesterday morning, and the decision to uphold his suspension means he misses tomorrow's final Test at Joha
nnesburg's Ellis Park.

The Springboks, who hold an unassailable 2-0 series lead, will also be without flanker Schalk Burger, who was cited and banned for eight weeks after being found guilty of making contact with the eye area of Lions' wing Luke Fitzgerald. Springbok coach Peter de Villiers insists there will be no let-up despite making ten changes to his starting line-up.

Debutant Zane Kirchner, Odwa Ndungane, Jongi Nokwe, Jaque Fourie, Wynand Olivier and Morne Steyn come into a backline which sees Fourie du Preez as the only survivor from the last game. There is also a new look among the forwards, where only captain John Smit, vice-captain Victor Matfield, Tendai Mtawarira and Juan Smith remain from last Saturday's bruising 28-25 series-clinching win in Pretoria.

Alongside them will be Chiliboy Ralepelle, Johann Muller, Heinrich Brussow and Ryan Kankowski, but de Villiers is adamant the world champions will not at all be weakened despite two thirds of the team being changed.

"We believe the guys selected are as good as the others and that they can go out and do an outstanding job for the Springboks," said de Villiers. "They will also bring fresh energy to the team after two tough Tests. We respect the British and Irish Lions so much, and we want to give everybody a run against them. If they miss out on this opportunity, then they might not play against them again in their lifetime."

From the ten players that have made way, four – Frans Steyn, Ruan Pienaar, Bismarck du Plessis and Pierre Spies – have been handed a place on the bench, alongside Gurthro Steenkamp, Deon Carstens and the uncapped Steven Sykes.

Sharks lock Sykes has been named following Botha's unsuccessful appeal.

Looking back at a turbulent past few days, in which Burger's discipline issues have taken centre stage, de Villiers felt he was unnecessarily sucked into the debacle by the British media.

He added: "A lot was said this week, I think too much. The off-the-field stuff sometimes gives you more sleepless nights than the on-field stuff. We had negative media from Britain in 1974 and 1980 and now I've allowed it again in 2009. I've learnt that if they can't win on the field, then they will try to win anywhere else they can."







Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 July 2009 10:07 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: British and Irish Lions
 
1

Fat one,

Edinburgh 03/07/2009 01:55:03
Me thinks that Alasdair Campbell and Sir Clive have been 'advising' PDV. He has not done himself any favours! IRB need to sort out the inconsistencies of the gouging, Quinlans looked a lot more harmless than Bergers but he got 4 more weeks. Still the BOD tackle (To welcome him to the game) 4 years ago was potentiall a lot more dangerous. The Saffers are really into their off the ball stuff, this will ruin rugby!
2

La barrière de Senlis,

France 03/07/2009 06:24:07
I think the ban of "weeks" is ridiculous!
Some players are deliberately more violent and nasty when they do not have risks to compromise their Club and Nations when they know there are not so many games planed at the end of a season.
IRB should ban for a NUMBER of games!
3

Joburg Pete,

03/07/2009 06:46:54
Pdv has embarrassed us again. I dont believe he is actually the manager of our side. Many Bok supporters believe that Dick Muir is the man who makes the rugby decisions and Pdv is the face of the Springbok management. Nevertheless, the bans are handed out by the IRB and that is that.
We have won the series and we deserved it. World Champions or not, we were pushed all the way by a spirited Lions side who I applaud for their efforts and professional approach to the game.
I applaud the Springbok players and Dick Muir, but I am very disappointed in Pdiv
4

daffy_b,

03/07/2009 11:12:29
#2 I COMPLETELY AGREE.

#3 WELL SAID!
I think PDV has done the RSA union great harm in his blind support of his cited players, instead of being more "political" in his comments.

I have not been one of those who have ranted at length about the physical tactics of the sides playing the Lions. Physicality is part of rugby, and an especially big part of the South African game - I for one admire the RSA win-win-win attitude and how they are willing to put their body on the line, and am a little ashamed at some of the bad-loser bleating from some Lions supporters about how they were "bullied" off the park by the Bokke.
None of the those Lions supporters would be moaning if it was their team that were the "bullies" and the victors in the 2 tests.

You can't honestly say that you go along to watch a match, and gasp in awe at a bone-crunching tackle, and then say that the game should be dumbed down. (we'll be playing rugby league next - heaven forbid !!)

However!! this is where the greay area lies....When does physicality become violence/assault - that is the area the IRB needs to be clear and consistent on.

Burger was wrong, and should have bene cited and banned - and was. Italy Captain Parisse however was far more mailicious in his infringement against NZ, and should have recieved a much longer ban (and possibly as he was the captain - an even longer ban, as he is meant to set an example)....!

I would have loved the Lions to have won the tests, and was riveted during the matches, but was in awe at the power and tenacity of the Bokke, and their strength in depth. And hate to admit it, but the better side won.
5

Rambling Sid Rumpo,

03/07/2009 12:18:34
In all truth there was not a lot in the last test - it was very tight and without ROG's rashness would have likely been a draw.

The anonymity of the IRB officials dealing with the gouging is not a good portent - what have they got to hide? I wish the rugby journalists would name them more often. Anyway, I believe the Chairman of the IRB Judicial Panel is Tim Gresson, though I know nothing about him.

Divvy De Villiers, if he is merely a front man is the worst possible choice for the role. I would fire the selectors who chose him, though frankly it might be doing SA a favour so then again maybe not!
6

Kenny Boy,

03/07/2009 12:21:01
Daffy, couldn't agree more with you. You are spot on with all you say. SA rugby needs to get the off the ball stuff out of their game but their power is awesome. I'd take 1 or 2 players with that physical intensity in the Scotland team.
PdV is a disgrace to rugby and SA with his comments. He must be seen as a joke in SA

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.