Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Drink Driving, Don't Risk It!

RBS chief's £9.6m pay package defended

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 June 2009
A TOP finance official yesterday defended the potential £9.6 million pay deal granted to Stephen Hester, the chief executive of Royal Bank of Scotland.
John Kingman, the chief executive of UK Financial Investments (UKFI) – the company created to manage the stakes taken by the Westminster government in major banks as part of a massive bailout package – said he was "very comfortable" with Mr Hester's
pay deal.

He stressed that it required Mr Hester to hit performance targets that will give shareholders a healthy return.

But the agreement has angered shareholders, unions and some politicians, coming as it does so soon after a scandal over the multi-million-pound pension bestowed on Mr Hester's predecessor, Sir Fred Goodwin, whose aggressive expansion of the bank was blamed for its downfall.

"The key point about it is that his reward is very highly geared to the return the taxpayer will make on his investment," Mr Kingman said during a conference at the London Business School.

"I also think we have a very strong interest in being able to retain and recruit high quality people.

"We need serious people to run these banks."

The government holds a 70 per cent stake in RBS through UKFI. It also has a 43 per cent stake in Lloyds Banking Group, which took over HBOS in a deal completed earlier this year.

Mr Kingman said any move by UKFI to pay lower salaries to bank executives than other institutions would not be a "sensible gamble to take".

Under the agreement, Mr Hester will receive a fixed £1.65m cash payment, including salary of £1.2m.

To receive the full amount, which includes bonuses, shares in RBS would have to average at least 70p over 30 days during the last six months of the performance period, which covers three years from the start of 2009.

If the shares hit 55p, Mr Hester will get 50 per cent of the amount. If they remain at 40p he would get 25 per cent.

The bank's shares closed up 2 per cent at 38.94p yesterday.

"If Stephen does well on his package, I will be extremely happy because the taxpayer would make a profit," Mr Kingman said.

The salary package was announced at the same time retailer Marks & Spencer said its chief executive and marketing officer had offered to forgo a third of their long-term bonus awards and as British Airways chief executive Willie Walsh and other board members agreed to forgo their salaries for July.





Page 1 of 1

 
1

,

30/06/2009 08:18:13
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

drunken proffet,

Tassy 30/06/2009 09:49:55
I never knew that the Scotsman had a political content filter on the go. I commented that I would rather visit Ch#na that the Middle E##t and got turfed out. Commented that top executives should have fixed wage and suffer a reduction in wage if they fail to meet their targets. Well like the rest of us. That could get me turfed out. The good point was that they appeared to agree that some cure for Springer with an S should be found.
3

bluehead,

edinburgh 30/06/2009 10:40:08
this is what you call a lesson on how to defend the indefensible,and further proof that the people of Briain have lost their marbles
what a bunch of nutters we must be to allow such a thing to happen
they have the cheek to say this is a democratic country,meaning fairness to all,
it does not look like it ,does it?
4

Saoghal Beag,

30/06/2009 11:41:13
high salaries having ensured the recent success of the banks...?
5

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 30/06/2009 11:57:28
Surely the artificial chasing of high share price was one of the factors which caused Goodwin to take unnecessarily high risk investments and acquisitions? What we need is a steady hand on the tiller, not some "star" banker careering around putting the bank and its employees and shareholders at risk again.

Kingman is correct that we need "serious" people to run banks but then offers euphemisms for doing the opposite such as that he is "very comfortable" with the pay package offered to Mr Hester. This seems to follow the Brown mandate to pur petrol on the fire with excesses of spendingto cling to power and get headlines at any price. Little wonder that we shareholders are irate about this package.
6

Willie Mor,

30/06/2009 12:49:01
Ah yes I am sure that in addition to the government man being comfortable with the RBS chief's bumper payday, so too will be the RBS man.

The feeding frenzy for Labour and their chums just goes on and on.

And with the proposals being considered to end free NHS care, we all know where the money to fund the busted banks is coming from.
7

,

30/06/2009 14:13:39
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

Electric Hermit,

30/06/2009 17:49:57
Penal taxation of that part of a salary which exceeds a given multiple of the minimum wage or the lowest remuneration paid within the organisation, whichever is greater.

And free packs of Kleenex for everyone so we can dry our tears when these "executives" bu**er off to some other country as they threaten (should that be "promise") to do.

9

Jacqueline Hyde ,

On the shelf 30/06/2009 18:39:13
I've nothing against high rewards for those who are prepared to stake their everything for the benefit of the country or even just their shareholders.

This is not that sort of scenario. Bank executives don't use their own resources as the stake. They gamble with other people's money and do so in the full knowledge that the government will bail them out one way or another - even when they have acted with what would be criminal negligence in any other sphere.

When bank staff are being laid off w1lly-nilly, when pensioners are seeing a zero return on their savings, when shareholders have seen their shares all but belly up and their actual shareholdings diminished by over 50% and when UK taxpayers are left with a bill that could take generations to pay, there is absolutely no justification possible for such obscene remuneration packages.

If Kingman thinks otherwise, he should surely be kicked out of his job. Where on earth has he been over the last twelve months? Has he not read any newspapers? Has he not seen any television news?



10

Electric Hermit,

30/06/2009 18:56:34
"Mr Kingman said any move by UKFI to pay lower salaries to bank executives than other institutions would not be a "sensible gamble to take"."

So this excessive pay package is justified by reference to other excessive pay packages.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.