Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Rape convictions: 'A shameful stain on our criminal justice system'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 May 2009
THE abysmal conviction rate in rape cases is a shameful stain on Scotland's proud criminal justice system.
Not even three per cent of allegations ends in a guilty verdict. That either means 97 per cent of people – the vast majority of them women – who cry rape are liars or there is something fundamentally wrong with the way the police and courts handle t
heir claims.

Only a fool or the worst kind of misogynist would back the former.

Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini has taken an impressive lead in challenging the failings. When she was Solicitor General she ordered a review of how sexual offences are prosecuted, and 50 recommendations are being implemented, including new specialist rape investigation teams and better training for those who deal with victims.

The Scottish Parliament is also in the final stages of approving laws which will further tighten the law by bringing in new definitions for assaults and, crucially, making it clear that consent to sex must be given freely – and can be taken away at any time.

The moves to protect women are to be applauded, especially given that in the Lothians last year only five out of 170 rape claims sent to prosecutors led to a guilty verdict. The quicker new tougher laws are in force the better.

But will it be enough? Last month Ann Robertson, a witness in a rape trial, was jailed overnight for fleeing the High Court when it all became too much for her. And last Friday cage fighter Edgar Kudzhoyan was jailed for just 30 months after being found guilty of raping a teenager.

All of which suggests that a complete change of culture is needed before Scottish courts give rape victims the justice they deserved. A rethink on our laws on corroboration should be debated as part of that.

They're not all at it
POLITICIANS? They're all at it. After two weeks of extraordinary revelations about MPs' expenses it is easy to descend into cynicism about our "public servants".

There's much to be cynical about after claims for second homes, chandeliers and £250 alarm clocks.

It's refreshing, then, to see that the claims of Lothian councillors actually went down last year. And to note that, after a few high-profile embarrassments, Holyrood's house is in good enough order to be a possible blueprint for a reformed Westminster.

Some are still spending too much of our money, but those who can account for every penny claimed deserve the benefit of the doubt.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 May 2009 8:44 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Rape and the legal system
 
1

SandyBottoms,

Edinburgh 26/05/2009 11:10:13
While I accept that it is simply not the case that97% of women who claim to be raped are lying, have you investigated the reasons given for case dismissal/not-guilty verdict/etc? This information would give you a better idea of where to focus your attentions rather than running around "strengthening" laws willie-nillie and wasting money on "rape myth" campaigns which the public may not have any effect on the number of rape convictions. Don't spout ideology, give me evidence.
2

Edinburgh 100,

Musselburgh 26/05/2009 13:35:46
"The moves to protect women are to be applauded" The law should be there to protect all people. It should not be weighted in one direction surely. "only five out of 170 rape claims sent to prosecutors led to a guilty verdict" considering that no evidence has been provided to support this satistic should it be used. The failings would appear to be in how the victim is treated at the very start to the investigation and then through the court system. Because only 5 out of 170 prosecutions led to a convictions does not mean the law is wrong. Just by changing definitions of assault or rewording present law in an attempt to increase convictions does not automaticly mean that convictions will increase.
3

James (1),

26/05/2009 21:31:18
Any rape is one rape too many. That said whilst it is only right that women get the care and support from having been a victim of such a horrible crime I think the man should not be named.
I also think that any woman who makes a false allegation should also be put through the justice system.
What are the statistics for those making false allegations being charged? Those statistics I am sure would also be shocking!
The rapist deserves all that the justice system can throw at him but once you name someone and if they are found not guilty then their life is never going to be the same.
4

James (1),

26/05/2009 21:32:14
I mean being named before the trial. Afterwards if found guilty he should be splashed all over the media!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Was six days an acceptable wait for police to issue an alert about the taxi rapist?
No, women should have been warned straight away
Yes, I’m sure police had a good reason for the delay
Maybe, if they weren’t sure of the details of the crime


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.