Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Fury as civil servants scoop record bonuses

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 23 November 2008
TREASURY officials who oversaw the Northern Rock debacle and the onset of the credit crunch have been rewarded with record bonuses, Scotland on Sunday can reveal.
New figures show that civil servants at the UK Exchequer pocketed £1.2m on top of their basic pay last year, with one senior figure getting a bonus of £18,000.

The sum is nearly double that given to Treasury officials three years ago, when bonuses amounted to £700,000.

The bonuses were earned during the 2007-08 financial year, when the Treasury was accused of failing to move quickly enough to prevent the disaster of the Northern Rock crash.

One in four members of the Treasury's in-house staff was given a "performance bonus" – a lump sum on top of civil servants' salaries which rewards high achievement.

The average sum given to each member of staff who qualified for the reward amounted to £2,349.

On top of that, a third of the Treasury's staff got a "special bonus", in recognition of their response to "particularly demanding tasks or situations". Average payments were £463.

The revelation of the payments will be embarrassing for ministers as they have urged bank chiefs to suspend their own bonus culture during the credit crunch. RBS and Lloyds TSB have issued a bar on bonuses this year after they were forced to go to the Government for emergency funding.

Far from bonuses in the Treasury being scrapped, they have now grown for four successive years.

For senior staff, the rewards are particularly high, with top bonuses last year £4,000 higher than in 2006-07.

Ministers insist that bonuses are an important way of rewarding civil servants who perform well under often difficult circumstances.

Whitehall sources also pointed out that the overall pay bill at the Treasury was falling by 5% as part of a wider bid to cut administration costs across government.

Nevertheless, critics say that for officials to be accepting hefty bonuses at a time when households are having to tighten their belts is unacceptable.

Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: "Giving Treasury officials record bonuses for a year in which the economy has gone into serious decline is totally unreasonable.

"With ordinary families struggling to make ends meet in the recession it's an insult to dish out prizes for all in the department which has overseen such serious economic problems. Bonuses are meant to reward success, not failure."

The bonuses were awarded in a year in which the Treasury, along with the Financial Services Authority and the Bank of England, were sharply criticised for their response to the Northern Rock affair – the first run on a British bank in more than 100 years.

A report by the Treasury Select Committee found that the three bodies had ended up "with the worst of both worlds" by failing to react quickly enough.

The figures refer to the 2007-8 financial year so do not take into account the Treasury's performance in handling the recent economic turmoil.

Meanwhile, the Cabinet Office has pointed out that the Government is on course to have the lowest number of civil service staff since the Second World War.

A spokesman for HM Treasury said: "Over the current spending review period, covering the years to 2010-11, the Treasury has committed to a 5% year-on-year real terms reduction in its administration budgets, which includes all pay costs."

The Treasury figures are just the tip of the iceberg across government, which is thought to pay bonuses in excess of £100m a year across all departments.

Staff at the Ministry of Defence and the Department for Work and Pensions take the lion's share of the extra payments.

But there were also large payments to staff at HM Revenue and Customs, which last year lost disks containing the personal data of more than 25 million people.


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 22 November 2008 9:19 PM
  • Source: Scotland On Sunday
  • Location: Scotland
 
1

FTH22inarow,

23/11/2008 01:42:10
funny i thought the norther rock debacle occurred before the public sector took over?
2

Guga II,

Rockall 23/11/2008 03:42:07
Rewarding failure; something that the New Labour Sleaze and Corruption Party excels at.
3

Mercutio,

FALKIRK 23/11/2008 04:31:49
The biggest obscenity is the armchair warriors at the MOD receiving bonuses whilst soldiers on the frontline are dying because of equipment shortage/failure.
4

terry osser,

morden 23/11/2008 06:12:51
you-the scots-vote for them and i agree with the 3 posts above
5

Monxton,

Gosport 23/11/2008 08:23:12
Sloppy reporting and as a Civil Servant (and proud to be one) I'm getting sick to the back teeth of with it.

The figures you report are the highest bonus and the average for the normal run of the mill civil servants, below the Mandarin grades is nearer £320 which doesn't count towards pension and is paid for by lower wage increases.

Many staff this year got an extra wage increase -whoopee - Hold on a minute - otherwise they would have been below minimum wage.

For a moment I thought I was reading a rag like the Mail, Express or Torygraph not the paper that proports to be the best in Scotland.
6

Down-to-earth,

Warsaw 23/11/2008 08:36:08
Or did you mean 'purports', Mr Civil Servant?
7

Roy,

23/11/2008 08:38:30
Civil service? Bonuses?
8

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 23/11/2008 08:41:29
#6 Monxton

So what's wrong with the Mail, Express, Telegraph? Reporting standards seem to be consistently much higher than the Hootsmon and Herald rags and express common sense opinions. There seems to be an implicit assumption here that because yer Scottish an' that that you've got to be one of the sheeple, one of Gordo's unthinking masses. The point being that why is any Civil Servant getting any bonus at all at the moment when their overall performance is dire to the extreme and furthermore there is no money in the pot that does not have to be borrowed by Gogs and Darling to fund your lifestyles. That means a negative bonus for the likes of us who pay tax and do productive jobs!
9

billengland,

23/11/2008 08:41:29
@monxton

I am all in favour of civil servants and public employees being paid minimum wage.

They certainly shouldn't be paid bonuses, nor should any public servant. It is supposed to be a vocation, and the country pays them accordingly.

10

scottishcoffindodgerno1,

Tram City 23/11/2008 08:44:36
6# For a civil servant you'r pretty thick,when did the scotsman become the best paper in scotland.It's a british Government RAG, Also if you are getting more than the minimum wage you'r overpaid
11

The Strategist,

23/11/2008 08:53:42
It sets an appalling example to the City... How can Darling tell the banks etc not to pay bonuses when his own department pays them?

It tells you two things...

Firstly, Darling and Brown believe in one rule for them and another for the rest of us.. Typical commisariat type behaviour..

Secondly, Darling doesn't actually mean to stop bonuses in the City...

12

,

23/11/2008 09:04:06
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

Pilrig.,

Livingston 23/11/2008 09:26:18
4 : "you the Scots vote for them" -not as much as the Geordies do.
14

Pilrig.,

Livingston 23/11/2008 09:28:09
6 - it's a hard life ! (working in a nice warm office )
15

cabrach loon,

inverness 23/11/2008 09:40:30
in past times when the government had some morals I always understood that job security and a decent pension were what civil servants received as compared with the real world where job tenure was less secure and pensions were poorer, now it seems civil servants especially top and senior ones expect to be treated as obscene CEO's of corporations and this is clearly wrong! Ditto MP's.
16

Warden An' All, Reborn,

23/11/2008 09:42:46
The bankers got it wrong and the civil servants were sent in to patch thing up. What a good job they have made of it. Out of the two, the bankers or the civil servants, who deserves a bonus for their work? No contest really.
17

,

23/11/2008 09:47:10
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
18

Warden An' All, Reborn,

23/11/2008 10:01:44

18-Union is ¬Best-Which part of the government’s restructuring allowed the American economy have such a powerful effect on ours?


19

,

23/11/2008 10:08:13
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
20

ddmc,

23/11/2008 10:21:47
There's a slight difference between 18k as opposed to 1.8 million
21

Sile,

23/11/2008 10:24:23
4# Terry I begged on this paper before the Glenthroes by-election to put the country first and vote these marxists out of goverment, did the 'eck. and to 14# this marxist cabul is in power because they rely on the block vote of Scotland, that by election could have been the nail in Browns/Darling coffin..
22

Observer. 1,

Glasgow 23/11/2008 10:32:23
I doubt very much if the ''ordinary'' civil servant wants their wage made up by bonus - I am sure they would rather have a fair wage full stop.

Bringing in bonuses and performance related pay is a wheeze designed to being private sector working practices into the public sector, because private is supposed to be best.

Yep, the same private sector which has collapsed and is being bailed out by the public sector as we speak.

Civil servants, like other public sector workers, should just be paid a fair wage for the work they do, and leave the bonuses out, they are not necessary.
23

Duke,

23/11/2008 10:53:29
This is the Senior Civil Service that the bonus payments are being made to, a bunch of incompetent fools.
24

Raymond Thomas Brooke,

Leven England 23/11/2008 10:55:51
It is not just Whitehall civil servants The East Riding of Yorkshire county Council have just approved substantialincreases to their senior executives one of whom is earning over £150,000 pa whist at the other end of their work force receive the bare minimum.
the whole lot stinks
25

chico y,

23/11/2008 10:57:21
Voters of Glenrothes you must be proud.

Liebore keep there snouts in the trough and screw you. Still you might get a wee cut in VAT.

Liebore are Robin Hood in reverse. Take from the poor and give to the Rich fat cat civil servants who do f all except their masters bidding.

Looks like they've scuppered HBOS staying independent. I wonder how many HBOS employees are liebour fans now or will be soon. Liebore sleaze numpties that run the big unions are going to have their work cut out to put a positive spin once jobs start to go.
26

Observer. 1,

Glasgow 23/11/2008 11:06:26
24 - no, that's just the bonuses that have been highlighted. Poster 6 has explained it. But if the bonus system wasn't there, then the senior mandarins wouldn't be able to be rewarded either.

25 - right again. Local authorities are being encouraged down the same road, bring in private sector pay rates for senior managers and directors and et voila local authorities performance will improve. Except it doesn't, because the theory is rubbish.

It's endemic right across the public and ''voluntary'' sector. Some directors of housing associations get paid more than the Prime Minister for managing a few thousand houses. It's nonsensical, and these senior managers are the ones who expect their staff to survive on a pittance.
27

fegan,

Newtownards 23/11/2008 11:11:03
The average Civil Servant is under paid and under valued, But they do have fire proof pensions and fantastic working practices like Lexi hours etc.
This business of Bonuses is all to much no matter what walk of life you are employed in .
The salary should reflect the job in hand and if you cant make the grade you get fired, simple.
In the civil service, some it would appear get promoted to the point of their own incompetence and then left there and hope the staff around them pick up the pieces.If you are at a high enough grade and the rest of the staff do there job the idiot at the top gets the bonus. Bad System
28

subrosa,

23/11/2008 11:36:36
# 6

Civil servants have a strong union. What are they doing to ensure nobody who works for the public is paid below the minimum wage?

Let me guess... nothing. Same as all unions, they're not interested in their members, their interest is in ensuring they keep their own jobs and giving your subs to the labour party.

Time you civil servants sorted them out.
29

Warden An' All, Reborn,

23/11/2008 12:27:04
20-Union is ¬Best-Abdication of any responsibility for the economy has nothing to do with it. Do you believe any government would willingly walk into a situation we have found ourselves in?
Did any of the major parties in Great Britain predict from 1997 onwards what was to befall the world economy, and how sub prime lending could be a catalyst for the events to unfold?
Did Alex Salmond realise his plans for a newly independent Scotland was a disaster waiting to happen, or did the world economic situation come out of the blue to him?
The credit goes to those who are able to ride out the storm I’m afraid, no one ever gets the credit for catching the danger just before it potentially might happen.
30

Vlad Tepes,

Snagov 23/11/2008 12:35:39
#29 I understand the union are in dispute with these fat cats for offering the rest of the Civil Service a rise that is a fraction of the rate of inflation.
31

Observer. 1,

Glasgow 23/11/2008 12:44:09
29 - 31 is right.

Also the PCS are not affiliated to the Labour Party.

So you're wrong on both counts.
32

JH Ross,

raleigh 23/11/2008 14:02:30
looks like you have thieves like we do in the USA
33

Grad 1,

Edinburgh 23/11/2008 14:31:03
I'd be more interested to know what bonuses were paid to the numpties at the FSA who were supposed to be regulating this industry whilst the current mess was being created.
I remember reading an article a couple of years ago where the Head of the FSA justified their usefulness on the basis they had 118 staff on more than £100k a year. He obviously thought this meant they must be really really good at what they do. The only problem as it turned out was that they do nothing, granted they are exceptionally talented at doing nothing, hence the huge salaries and lack of action.
34

subrosa,

23/11/2008 15:09:47
# 32

Observer, I really don't care which unions are affiliated to the labour party. My point is that if you join a union who promise to support and protect you in your working environment then they should be doing just that.

The PCS ought to be ashamed that people are being employed at lower than the national minimum wage. Now there's a reason for striking - not the fact that everyone wants an increase over the cost of inflation.
35

PointOf View,

Scotland 23/11/2008 15:15:15
What about all the reported civil servants non jobs recently! That is civil servants with no identified function, yet basically being paid until a job becomes available, my heart bleeds,not!
Cut half the jobs immediately and make the rest work for there pay, same as the rest of us have to. And most definately NO bonuses after all this is public money.
Can anyone remember the figure re how many civil servants are employed by this government?
36

PointOf View,

Scotland 23/11/2008 15:29:30
I have been a member of the Union for twenty five years. However, after HBOS I intend to and urge everyone else to If a member, request the Union remove there contribution to the Liebour party from their membership dues (request a form from your union).
That is a clear message to the Union Scotland demands choice re whothey suppor politically.
Unions are in bed with Liebour. In the name of equality why cant a member choose which, if any, political party he/she would like to support via his/her membership/dues?



Glenrothes, wonder how many of you voted for Liebour and work/ed for HBOS or a friend or relative does? Well done, congratulations, enjoy your future.
37

Observer. 1,

Glasgow 23/11/2008 17:44:45
35. Read your post again. You said:

''What are they doing to ensure nobody who works for the public is paid below the minimum wage....Let me guess, nothing...and giving your subs to the Labour Party''.

You were wrong, both times, and it would be more gracious of you to admit it, than to stick to your Thatcherite mantra that the unions do nothing for working people.

And for your information, public sector pay claims on the union side are always weighted towards the low paid.

It is the civil service who set the pay scales, not the unions.

Nobody is saying that the unions are perfect, but they are only as strong as their members, and your objective seems to be to put as many people off joining as possible.
38

Observer. 1,

Glasgow 23/11/2008 18:00:26
37 Nobody has to pay the political levy, that has been the case for years. So membership of a Trade Union does not mean you support Labour.

It is very depressing that the most prominent anti trade unionists on these threads are always SNP supporters, Scotland has a changing political landscape and nationalists need to change with it.

The PCS (the same union Sub Rosa attacks) put forward a motion at the STUC Inverness conference calling on the STUC to back the democratic principle that any referendum must include independence as an option. It was passed, that is now trade union policy, despite the historical link to Labour.

The SNP described the support for the independence option as a ''momentous development''.

These developments are not helped if nationalists behave in a tribalistic way, rooted in the past, and not helping the future. Why should trade union members want to vote for a party who's supporters appear to despise them ?
39

Harry Carnie,

British Columbia, Canada. 23/11/2008 18:11:44
Well if there is any consolation in the phrase "misery loves company"
The taxpayers here in Canada are with you.

Our government is shoveling the bonuses , and raises, out to senior executives in our civil service much as though one would shovel food out to pigs eating from a trough.

Might be warranted IF it was deserved but it IS NOT.
The facilities, and the poor blokes (dedicated men/women) doing the job get the "messy end of the stick".
40

,

23/11/2008 19:35:16
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
41

Big Carbon Footprint,

Edinburgh 23/11/2008 21:14:11
What the Labour Party has done in regards to the bloated public sector is to buy votes, who really is going to vote for another party which promises to cut the bureaucracy when you can have a non job thanks to the labour party, and to think people believe socialism and communism is great!
42

subrosa,

24/11/2008 00:09:01
# 39

My post at # 35 was to clarify what I meant and you didn't accept that. That's fine, your choice.

I don't need a lesson on civil service unions thanks.

I do agree with your last sentence. Unions are no longer interested in their membership. Their membership have been far too complacent in the past 30 years so they deserve all they get (or don't). What astonishes me is that, after all these years, so many people continue to contribute to a union who really feel their members are just an inconvenience.

I wouldn't encourage anyone to join a union today, that's true.

So the CPS voted to include independence at the STUC conference. I can't contain my excitement.

My comments about trade unions are nothing whatsoever to do with my political leaning, I've told you that before. Why do you insist they are?
43

Not a Tory,

Edinburgh 24/11/2008 11:10:39
Here’s a balanced view…
I am a civil servant and get paid less than my contemporaries in the private sector. I accept this as I get perks such as job security (hopefully), holidays, flexi-time and a good pension. My profession is specialised, poorly paid and indeed – a vocation. However, I have no idea what billengland is on if they think I should work at minimum wage because “It is supposed to be a vocation, and the country pays them accordingly.” Err – why? If I was an accountant or worked in HR should I take the minimum wage for the sake of the country? No – I’d go to the private sector where I am recognised and rewarded for my qualifications and experience. If people persist in this civil servant bashing then there will be no talented people left who are prepared to work for the “country” (or council) for less pay than private sector equivalents.

On the other hand…
There are a lot of lazy ass folk who see the Civil Service as a cushy number. Hard work and initiative is not rewarded so eventually, you think – ‘why am I busting a gut here when the guy (literally) across the desk from me is doing sod all and progressing at the same rate as me?’ The problem with the Civil Service is poor management and an inability because of red tape to reward ordinary workers who excel and get rid of those who don’t. This bonus thing is obviously just for senior civil servants as ordinary workers see none of it!
44

,

27/11/2008 14:37:37
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
45

,

27/11/2008 14:38:33
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
46

Ewan Oosami,

29/11/2008 15:31:57
#6, Why the hell should civil servants be paid bonuses for doing their jobs - any bonus should be that you keep your job. Just remember the second part of your job description......servant.....remember who pays your wages.
We could easily get rid of half the civil servants today and NOBODY would notice the difference because most of them do FA in the shape of actual work and I speak from experience.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.