Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Drink Driving, Don't Risk It!

We Will Rock You - see it in Edinburgh this Christmas

A 60-year-old scandal, an eminent botanist and a plant that was planted

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 October 2008
THE discovery of a rare plant on the Isle of Rum in the 1940s led scientists to question whether the Ice Age had ever reached the Scottish isles.
Now, more than half a century later, it has emerged that the man credited with finding the plant had grown it in his Newcastle garden before replanting it in the Inner Hebrides.

Professor John Heslop-Harrison, formerly of Newcastle University, led scientific investigations to the Hebrides in the 1940s. But his "discovery" of rare Arctic alpine plants, which he claimed were indigenous to the Isle of Rum, was criticised in his lifetime and in recent years.

In his 1999 book, Karl Sabbagh put forward evidence that the professor had planted the species himself. Mr Sabbagh subsequently received widespread criticism from academics for his "unfounded" theories.

But now a debate that has gone down in botanic folklore has come to an end as fresh evidence has emerged implicating Prof Heslop-Harrison in faking the discovery that catapulted him to scientific fame.

Mr Sabbagh claims to have accessed reports by two fellow botanists that were uncovered in the Natural History Museum archives.

Botanist RB Cooke is said to have written of a 1943 expedition to the Isle of Rum: "I saw a dozen or more plants which in my opinion had been recently planted. There were to be seen marks which suggested a stone having been used to press in the soil round the roots."

Mr Sabbagh said: "When I did my research, they (the reports] weren't around and I rather wish they had been.

"It's quite satisfying years later to see two distinguished botanists who had both been worrying about this and clearly believed he was faking things."

Mr Sabbagh's book, A Rum Affair: A True Story Of Botanical Fraud, in which he accuses Prof Heslop-Harrison of fakery, was largely based on a hidden report by Cambridge University don John Raven.

Prof Raven infiltrated one of the expeditions to the Isle of Rum and wrote a report claiming that the Arctic alpine plants had been imported. However, he left instructions that his report should not be made public until Prof Heslop-Harrison had died.

After the publication of his book, Mr Sabbagh came under fire from Newcastle University academics, who accused him of disgracing the name of an eminent botanist. Dr Gregory Kenicer, a lecturer at the Royal Botanic Garden of Edinburgh, said: "This is a really famous affair which, for lots of botanists, is an extremely amusing topic. To the rest of the world, why someone would go to such great lengths to find fame may seem fairly ridiculous, but even in botanic circles this still seems a bizarre boast."

Dr Kenicer said that fortunately this was an isolated incident and that botanic forgery was certainly not commonplace.

He said: "It is also quite odd that someone would waste so much time and effort when botanists have just as much chance of becoming famous by finding real discoveries."

Cold beginnings for early Scots settlers

SCOTS first began establishing communities during the last ice age, which occurred around 13,000 years ago.

The remainder of the last glacial period, or ice age, ended about 10,000 years ago, and all that remains of the ice sheets that spanned continents are areas of Greenland and the Antarctic.

At this time, the location of northern European plains suggests that Scotland's first settlers were reindeer hunters from the Ahrensburgian culture.

Scientists also suspect that early Scots hunted deer and other large herbivores, as well as fish.

The last ice age was also more severe than the previous three known ice ages, with increased fluctuating and colder temperatures.

British archeologists discovered early settlements at Stronsay on Orkney last year dating from 11,000BC.

These findings predated an 8,500BC Edinburgh hunting campsite, which was previously thought to have been Scotland's oldest settlement.




Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 October 2008 9:36 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Scullion,

Canada 03/10/2008 01:11:02
#1, I'm not sure the cry for botanists at the front was terribly loud. Maybe they were part of the Home Guard as they were probably too old for service. Dudley Watkins of "Oor Wullie" fame was deemed by the British government to be doing his part during the war by drawing pictures. They all did their bit.

I've just noticed that some blackguard is using my name to post homophobic, personal attacks against fellow posters. I trust most people who read my nonsense knows that I'm a harmless liberal-plus I rarely post more than one note per subject.
2

,

03/10/2008 01:33:37
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Sylvia in Regina,

Canada 03/10/2008 02:32:12
#2 - Sorry to hear that some 'idiot' is using your name!! How the heck can they??? When I first signed on with The Scotsman a few years ago, I was LOCKED in with my name, and I cannot use another.

Have no fear... we know how you post!!!
4

British Military Vet Veritas,

US Embassy Teheran 03/10/2008 05:58:36

I predict that the 13,000 year old settlemnt will, in 60 years time, be also found to have been planted by archaeologists seeking fame!

I once planted a kiss, but that's another story.



5

Mcsnagpile,

03/10/2008 06:59:27
Everybiddy kens McTroggs chipper of the utter Hebredes, wiz makin chips long before Sir Walter invented the deep fryer.
6

Gordon A.,

Vancouver 03/10/2008 06:59:53
Well Hum bug how can one sleep thinking of the skull duggery done so long ago.
To think our father was south of London at the time and practicing medical procedures which went on to world fame later.

Well glad to know, so I hope I can sleep comfortably thinking of all the harm inflicted by this chap.

If not may I consider legal action, hehe
7

donald,

glasgow 03/10/2008 07:07:39
What did you expect from a guy who looked like Hitler in the 1940's?
8

yockel,

03/10/2008 07:22:12
That's the greenies for you. And I think it was spelt Rhum then, before an Icelandic tv presenter and revisionist persuaded someone that the spelling was un Gaelic unlike the hills on Rhum Askival, Hallival etc which clearly were.......
9

Guga II,

Rockall 03/10/2008 07:32:02
This was published in the Times yesterday. So much for the standard of journalism at the Hootsmon.
10

Helmut Smegma,

Edinburgh 03/10/2008 07:51:34
Who cares?
11

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 03/10/2008 08:01:27
He won't be the first and he won't be the last either! The global warmers aren't far behind Pof. Heslop-Harrison (nice alliteration). Al Gore has made a very nice living out of this type of deception for a time now. However in his case he hasn't even done anything as useful as buying a few plants from Dobbie's and planting them on Rhum!

The things people will do for fame. At least Prof. didn't appear on Big Brother.

12

GrahamH,

Edinburgh 03/10/2008 08:17:04
#10 Guga. I hear there is somewhat of a Stooshie going on in the financial markets and more than one paper is covering that story too.

One paper per story, is that what you are advocating?
13

yockel,

03/10/2008 08:45:41
OK Nomada, perhaps the comprehensive discussion was long after my time, so lets have Ruma then but your Sir George story isn't what I heard when I lived there back in the 70's in the days of the good old NCC.

The version that went round then was that the Victorian OS thought it sounded too alcoholic so they put in the "h." Probably no more truth in that version either. More likely the "h" went in because the locals (in the days when there was an indigenous population) didn't pronounce it Rrrrrum and bye the way everyone knew about Heslop- Harrison even then.
14

yockel,

03/10/2008 08:46:39
P.S. Nomada I like the way the SNH think they "own" the Island.
15

Guga II,

Rockall 03/10/2008 09:08:35
#15.

Don't be deliberately obtuse. I was pointing out that the story was published YESTERDAY in the Times, i.e. it is old news. The Hootsmon if they were in any way competent, would also have published the story yesterday.

Do you work for the Hootsmon?
16

Forrest,

Livingston 03/10/2008 09:26:06
"The discovery...led scientists to question whether the Ice Age had ever reached the Scottish isles"

Surely a more appropriate question would be whether the ice age had ever left...
17

Jacqueline Hyde ,

On the shelf 03/10/2008 09:33:42
The Scots didn't start arriving until about 9,500 years after the ice age.

Presumably Ben Bailey just copied the article from other newspapers and tacked on his own bit of muddled nonsense at the end. As for "Scientists also suspect that early Scots hunted deer and other large herbivores, as well as fish" - what else would they do? Pop out for a deep-fried Mars Bar?

[To add insult to injury, I had to change "N1p" to "Pop"!!)
18

Scythia,

Alba 03/10/2008 09:49:09
Unethical Scientists ; should make one wonder about the current "global warming" hyperbole and the "real" science (if any ) behind it.
19

Mìcheal a Eilean Rùim,

Richmond, British Columbia. 03/10/2008 10:12:48
The island is correctly called "an t-Eilean Rùm" and a person from Rum is a "Rumach" in Gaelic. Sir George and Lady Bullough decided to alter the name to "Rhum" to avoid the alcoholic implication. I know that because it was common knowledge on the island.
As for the Norse theory of the name, the names of the mountains of Rum are Norse, but the actual name of Rum is pre-Gaelic and the origin of the name is lost in the mists of time. Rum was mined for its bloodstone in prehistoric times, and the stone was traded throughout the Mediterranean area, including a beautiful axe head from Rum found near Nice in a farmer's field in the 1870s. There is also a beer sold in Canada, made from traces of seeds, etc. found in some broken pottery at Loch Scresort. And as a sad footnote, the descendants of most of the people who once lived on Rum can now be found on Prince Edward Island in Canada.
20

Mìcheal a Eilean Rùim,

Richmond, British Columbia. 03/10/2008 10:14:07
The island is correctly called "an t-Eilean Rùm" and a person from Rum is a "Rumach" in Gaelic. Sir George and Lady Bullough decided to alter the name to "Rhum" to avoid the alcoholic implication. I know that because it was common knowledge on the island.
As for the Norse theory of the name, the names of the mountains of Rum are Norse, but the actual name of Rum is pre-Gaelic and the origin of the name is lost in the mists of time. Rum was mined for its bloodstone in prehistoric times, and the stone was traded throughout the Mediterranean area, including a beautiful axe head from Rum found near Nice in a farmer's field in the 1870s. There is also a beer sold in Canada, made from traces of seeds, etc. found in some broken pottery at Loch Scresort. And as a sad footnote, the descendants of most of the people who once lived on Rum can now be found on Prince Edward Island in Canada.
21

yockel,

03/10/2008 10:26:01
Yes Nomada @18 I do prefer that, for as SNH maintained when trying to unload responsibility for Kinloch Castle "The island of Rum is owned by SNH on behalf of the nation" ie as proxies.
22

danbob,

03/10/2008 10:41:24
"I will make the wisdom of the wise men perish, and the intelligence of the intellectual men I will shove aside" (1 Corinthians verse 18)

Oh how easy these fools are misled. Reminds me of the idiots a few month ago who bought the remains of what they thought was the Yeti. Turned out to be a rubber gorrila suit. Why do people hang on to every word scientists say.
23

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 03/10/2008 10:45:50
12 Helmut Sm*gma

You show a curious lack of curiosity or intellectual inquisitiveness. You must be a very boring person to talk to.

Dastardly deeds in academia. What else is new? It is always "publish or perish" at whatever cost to one's reputation or credibility.

I found this newsitem to be entrancing, pace Helmut.
24

Nellie,

Liverpool 03/10/2008 10:52:45
#8 Donald

Well, have you ever seen a photo or film of them standing together on a stage? Hmmmm ... you may be onto something...
25

Phil1,

Edinburgh 03/10/2008 11:07:25
Guga II,Rockall 03/10/2008 09:08:35

I tend to agree with GrahamH,Edinburgh if you hate the Scotsman so much why spend most of the day writing letters - does every newsaper have to publish what you want or they are idiots?

I am lost - if not complaining about the Scotsman being anti SNP you are complaining they should have written the story yesterday - Do you work for the SNP or the Herald it must be one of them?
26

Booster,

03/10/2008 11:17:05
Nice comment Phil1.

The comment pages here are often quite full of whingeing types that seem to go to extremes to find a bone to pick over.
I can only imagine it's a cathartic experience they can't get elsewhere.
27

Guga II,

Rockall 03/10/2008 11:21:35
#30.

You are obviously another amadan that needs to take their medication. You obviously spend most of your day checking on what and when I post comments; sad little man.

Incidentally, in case you weren't aware of it, it is quite allowable, in a free society, to be able to voice criticism of anything and everything.

As for complaining about the Hootsmon, you may have noticed that I am not the only one. They used to be an excellent newspaper but now are, sadly, a part of the New Labour propaganda machine. If enough people complain, and their circulation continues to drop, they may get their act together and revert to being a genuine newspaper again.

I don't work for the SNP, or any other political party, nor the Herald, I work for myself. Do you work for the New Labour Sleaze and Corruption Party?

28

AJ Fife,

03/10/2008 12:20:21
Well said Guga. I for one always appreciate and respect your views and I suspect there are plenty like me.

You speak your mind and you come across as a man of conviction, unlike the spineless wonders like #30 and #31!
29

,

03/10/2008 12:36:32
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
30

weh,

03/10/2008 12:54:33
This was published in the Times yesterday. So much for the standard of journalism at the Hootsmon."

Quelle surprise!!
31

wayne bijlyeerheid,

03/10/2008 13:20:49
quote>SCOTS first began establishing communities during the last ice age, which occurred around 13,000 years ago.<
Maybe our ancestors did, but not in present day Scotland

#21 Jacqueline Hyde
>The Scots didn't start arriving till about 9,500 years after the ice age<
Re. above point, arriving where?
32

Helmut Smegma,

Edinburgh 03/10/2008 13:23:49
# Hardly a headline-news item given the state of the worldwide economy and financial markets?

What`s on the agenda this weekend?,something equally as entranicng as the above article perhaps?
33

wayne bijlyeerheid,

03/10/2008 13:25:31
#30/31
I assume you mean the likes of #33, who, despite his name, has often outed himself as anti-Scottish and an anti-Protestant bigot.
34

Proud to have Scots blood,

Brooklyn, N. Y. 03/10/2008 14:21:39

How on earth would the ice age miss Scotland?
shame on Heslop-Harrison....Does he look a bit familiar in that photo to anyone else besides me?
35

Ananurhing,

03/10/2008 14:31:15
#32 GaunyirselGuga! Youtellemboy!

I would like to reitterate Guga's sentiments. This paper is a shadow of what it once was. Many of us would like to see it return to being a worthy read. Rather than the westminster toadying Nulab supporting propaganda sheet it has become!

The day might come soon enough. Editors and owners come and go. JP are looking ropy and there could be a wind of change blowing in from Kuala Lumpar soon enough. Criticism of the Hootsman is valid. They're there to be shot at. Especially Hamish!
36

Ananurhing,

03/10/2008 14:35:31
I remember reading that the St Kilda was clear of the ice sheet, which always seemed dubious to me. I'm guessing that theory is doubtful also. Anyone Know?

37

AJ Fife,

03/10/2008 14:54:28
#38,

So taking the mick out of Rangers FC and it's knuckle dragging fans is regarded as anti-Scottish and anti-Protestant???

Get a life you complete moron......
38

livilion,

livingston 03/10/2008 16:50:37
36 wayne bijlyeerheid
How long would those early inhabitants have had to wait until some continental types discovered them and called them Scots?
It must've been quite confusing back then: ur we Caledonians, Picts, Irish or Albanians? Naw, yer aw Scots by the way. Aye ferr nuff nat, so long as wur no English, know wit ah mean.(in Gaelic)
39

Winston,

France 03/10/2008 17:02:26
N°39 Its not Adolf is it!? What was he doing on Rum in 1943?
40

Roy Forrester,

Bloomsburg USA 04/10/2008 00:42:25
I do wish reporters daeling with scientific facts would get their facts correct. Unless the last Ice Ages was about 500 AD the Scots could not have been inhabiting Scotland or anywhere else for that matter. The "Scots" came over from Ireland during and after the Roman Occupation of Britian.
41

paul o,

Wodonga 06/10/2008 10:07:34
# 41 Ananurhing,03/10/2008 14:35:31
I can definately assure you that St Kilda, on the fore-shore of Port Phillip Bay, inner suburb of metropolotan Melbourne, was definately clear of the ice sheet. No gelological doubt about that!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.