Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Drink Driving, Don't Risk It!

Cameron's invitation seeking untainted outsiders

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 May 2009
DAVID Cameron said yesterday he would open up the Conservative candidate list to independents as he battled to prevent the loss of yet another Tory MP to the expenses scandal.
The Tory leader's attempt to appease public anger over the furore came as Julie Kirkbride, one of his backbenchers, came under intense pressure to follow the lead taken by her MP husband, Andrew MacKay, and stand down at the next election.

Mr MacKay, MP for Bracknell, and his wife, Ms Kirkbride, MP for Bromsgrove, used their expenses to pay off £1,000 a month in mortgage interest on their Westminster flat and a further £900 a month to pay off the mortgage on their family home. It has also emerged that Ms Kirkbride's brother stays regularly at her taxpayer-funded home.

However, despite Mr MacKay's decision to stand down, there was no sign last night that Ms Kirkbride will follow.

Mr Cameron increased the pressure on her by saying she still had "questions to answer" but he made it clear he believed her position was very different from that of her husband.

"To be fair to Julie, she does genuinely live in London, that's where her son goes to school, and she does have a genuine constituency home in Worcestershire," Mr Cameron said.

He acknowledged there were now new issues for her to address, concerning who else lived at her Worcestershire home. "She will have to answer those questions but I do think the two cases are quite different," he added.

Ms Kirkbride insisted her brother had not benefited from the arrangement.

The Conservative leader said he would invite anybody to apply to be a party candidate for the next election, even those with no previous involvement in the party or in politics. As long as they had a commitment to public service and shared the party's aims, they would be considered as candidates, he said.

Almost all the Conservative Party candidates for the next election were selected some time ago after long and rigorous selection processes. Long-standing members and those who had worked hard for the party in the past were often favoured because they had shown their commitment to the party.

But, with a number of MPs standing down because of the expenses scandal, there are now opportunities for new candidates to come forward, some in safe Tory seats.

Mr Cameron said: "What I'm going to do today is I'm going to reopen the Conservative candidate list to anybody who wants to apply. They may not have had anything to do with the party before. But I'm saying, if you believe in public service, if you share our values, if you want to help us clean up politics, come and be a Conservative candidate. We want to open up the talent that is available."

Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg said it was for each party leader to "sort out" expenses problems within their ranks, but predicted there would be further resignations.

"I suspect there will be a number of other MPs who fall on their swords as well," he said.

He called for a general election, but insisted it must be used as a vehicle for fundamental reform of Westminster.

• Stephen Fry has been voted the celebrity people would like to replace Michael Martin as Speaker in the House of Commons. He beat straight-talking Top Gear host Jeremy Clarkson, who came second. Newsnight's Jeremy Paxman was in third place to take on the job.

'IRRITATED' BLUNKETT PLAYS DOWN TALK OF ANOTHER COMEBACK

DAVID Blunkett yesterday expressed irritation at claims Gordon Brown could be considering him for a second Cabinet comeback.

The former home secretary was said to have been invited, with his fiancée, to the Prime Minister's country retreat, Chequers, earlier this month.

The report, in a Sunday newspaper, prompted suggestions that Mr Blunkett, who has twice resigned from the Cabinet, could yet return to the government.

A Cabinet reshuffle is expected in the aftermath of the European and council elections on 4 June, in which Labour is braced for a hammering.

But a spokesman for Mr Blunkett, who resigned as home secretary in 2004 and as work and pensions secretary in 2005, said he was not seeking another return.

He dismissed "speculation" that he could take over as Communities Secretary as an attempt to destabilise Hazel Blears, who has been criticised by the Prime Minister for failing to pay capital gains tax after the sale of her second home. A spokesman for Mr Blunkett said: "He is particularly irritated by speculation which he believes is designed to cause controversy about the future of Hazel Blears, the Communities and Local Government Secretary.

"He has no intention of being bounced by newspaper stories or speculation about future decisions of the Prime Minister, and is therefore keen to avoid such talk in the febrile atmosphere of the moment and talk of reshuffles after the European elections.

"He has made it clear on (numerous] occasions that he wishes to help the Prime Minister and the government with campaigning and policy from the back-benches."


Page 1 of 1

 
1

Curley Bill,

25/05/2009 00:05:10
Wrong thread, but get well soon, Miss Moffat.
2

Andrew Allan,

25/05/2009 00:32:08
Some say Tories have the squeaky clean gene genetically removed before conception. Others say it was never there in the first place.
3

For Scotlands Future,

Vote for the SNP 25/05/2009 00:37:37
Now there is hope for the future. The next PM of the UK is searching about for talent to form the next government.

Perhaps he should have a reality talent show: "Tory Party's got no talent"
4

Conan the Librarian™,

25/05/2009 00:41:58
These Tories must be able to find their own seat-even if it takes both hands.
5

Iainbroch,

25/05/2009 01:35:01
Tough David - Mother Theresa is not available!
6

,

25/05/2009 01:58:02
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 25/05/2009 07:48:39
It's a sad fact that Cameron recognises that virtually anyone would be better than the crowd of crooks and chisellers who are MPs.

And because the vast bulk of legislation being piled through is invented in Europe, there is much less of a need for domestic politicians in the first place. You are actually being governed by the likes of Neil Pillok. Scarey? Who's looked at their expenses? Well no one because they say they're not going to tell.

So we have ourselves in a lather about the swindlers who produce 20% of our legislation but have no idea about the other 80%! Time for a wee expose there I think, before Bliar elects himself President of Europe.
8

English Voice,

25/05/2009 07:56:57
I hear Jim Divine's electrician is thinking of applying.
9

Boy Wonder,

25/05/2009 08:18:30
I'm happy to see a great many Indies standing for Parly ... INSTEAD of the parties!!!

My youngest daughter says that Political party appear to have forgotten the "politics" and embraced the "party" too much!

Too right!!!
10

Jimmy Le Pie,

25/05/2009 08:50:06
I would think Jim Devine and Michael Connarty of The Devine-Connarty Furniture Trading Company are just the type of right wing entrepreneurs that Dave is looking for. Major Joyce would be another natural for the Tories.

Onwards the Union!
11

Number 6,

Germany 25/05/2009 09:03:10
Good grief, the poor tories .Can they fall any further than this ?.

I still think it's wrong these thieves are being able to walk away from this scandal scot free. Hopefully, enough Scots will feel disgusted enough to ditch the whole wretched lot of them.

Holyrood, even with it's sleaze drenched opposition, is a veritable haven of clean goverment compared with the cess pit that is Westminster.
12

Ewan Randall,

25/05/2009 09:22:56
(#13) – (Number 6) – Aren’t the poor tories, as you call them, heading into government?

Can you fall up?
13

The Creature from the Black Lagoon,

25/05/2009 09:25:14
Baggy Troosers, what you doing on here? Should you not be training to be a Minister?
14

Ewan Randall,

25/05/2009 09:26:00
Isn’t the only requirement of being untainted that you have not been caught?
15

Number 6,

Germany 25/05/2009 09:26:00
Maybe Ewan, if they can find any compitent, honest people prepared to associate with them.

I don't know who would be prepared to humiliate themselves in that way.
16

Ewan Randall,

25/05/2009 09:35:46
(#17) – (Number 6) – Do you think that those who would vote for the Tories might consider them honest enough to vote for and maybe join them as a Tory representatives in Parliament?
17

Number 6,

Germany 25/05/2009 09:59:07
#18 All the evidence would suggest they are anything but honest. Who in their right mind would consider them honest enough to vote for?

They may be seen as an alternative to Labour down south, but not in Scotland, which is all that matters to me.
18

For Scotlands Future,

Vote for the SNP 25/05/2009 10:01:59
#8
That would go down really well in Scotland, wouldn't it?

Unfortunately for them, and for Scotland, there are still a lot of people who will vote for anything with a red rosette pinned to it's @r$e.
19

Scottish and Proud,

Glasgow 25/05/2009 10:16:43
20 For Scotland's future
Unfortunately for them, and for Scotland, there are still a lot of people who will vote for anything with a red rosette pinned to it's @r$e.
=======================================================
That certainly used to be the case ,fortunately there are less and less Rufus types at every election.
They are literally dying off, the future is Scotlands.

Goodbye Westminster ,it was a blast while it lasted see ya!
20

For Scotlands Future,

Vote for the SNP 25/05/2009 10:18:01
#19
I feel sorry for the English voters who only have Tories, Libs or BNP as the alternative to Labour. As another article said: England seems to be in a political time-warp, where the rest of the UK has moved on.

However, we are doomed to have yet another unionist PM in Westminster bleating on about how "we" must preserve the union. The thing is, not one of them can come up with a tried and tested answer as to why we should.
21

Number 6,

Germany 25/05/2009 10:27:03
#22 I think it would be a brilliant move by the SNP if they fielded candidates right across the North of England.
22

For Scotlands Future,

Vote for the SNP 25/05/2009 10:35:10
#23
I think its been the policy of the SNP not to interfere in the politics of a foreign country.
23

hoblar,

25/05/2009 11:03:24
"I think its been the policy of the SNP not to interfere in the politics of a foreign country."

Yes indeed. the SNP support English democracy with English votes for English laws, and they support doing away with barnet and keeping all taxes raised in Scotland, in Scotland. England supports that as well, albeit because the English media (British media actually, but spinning in England in this case) are giving out that Scotland costs English tax payers.

Such a 'great' britain we have here where the spin is against another country (and against the Scottish Government) to feed sentiment that is actually a nail in the coffin of the union.

English votes for English laws doesn't suit new labour, so the methods used by their unionist twin party, the equally dreaded tories, is one that will, by default mean death to the union as Westminster is not only found out as being a haven for people sporting a dreadful economic incompetence that puts party politics over service to the people, but also unprecedented sleaze and pockling the public purse for individualist gain.

Even all this "SNP pick fight with Westminster" that failed to materialise beyond many many headlines (Jim Murphy and labour are the ones at that game) has turned into "EVERYBODY picks fight with Westminster!"

Scotland can vote to keep our elected representatives closer to home and more accountable to those who inhabit Scotland and actually vote for them.

If any Labour person is actually left on here finds that confusing, then their diminishing vote and the political oblivion that beckons new labour willsort that out, almost a darwinian concept as far as Scottish voting preferences have evolved over many years.

The Scottish voting preferences are going one way only, and the fact that the benefactors of the increasingly corrupt and irrelevant Westminster party politics is the twin part of new labour, the tories shows the discrepancies and square peg in a round hole of westminster and unionist p
24

hoblar,

25/05/2009 11:14:44
...as England votes another unionist party, the Tories that will certainly not see anything like a resurgence in Scotland.

Scotland has had enough of Tories in a red miiskirt and high heels that has been New Labour for the last twenty years, new labour have out toried the tories on war, determined to issue us with biometric id cards and also proved themselves utter economic incompetents putting everybody in the UK into enormous debt for generations to come.

Then there is the separate sleaze and corruption, particularly with making money for personal gain on the back of the public purse that both the tories and new labour have excelled at.......

Vote SNP, in Scotland you have that very good choice, and this slightly better written daily record of a newspaper and the other Scottish media are due the scrutiny the Westminster system is getting for their utter incompetence at presenting who is doing Scotland good, and who is just "doing" Scotland.

i think the Scottish electorate have moved on leaps and bounds in comparison with our press, flogging the horse of labour that is approaching rigor mortis rather than being merely dead.




25

ebbi,

spain 25/05/2009 11:35:24
signs of desperation !!!!! this is clearly the end of political franchise.
26

Proximaking,

Aberdeen 25/05/2009 13:05:22
They say a true mother is willing to die for her children. When will the so-called "mother of parliaments" (some joke!!) commit suicide and bring in a completely random system where individuals are picked not from the usual sleaze balls in the unions, the courts, the landed gentry or wherever else but from ordinary punters on the voters rolls? Choose MPs with a dart, a six year old child and a randomised voters role for that child's constituency. No corruption, completely democratic representation for once and as they only stay for six years (change one third out every two years) there would be no corruption. Of course not being a very good "mother" Westminster would never give up power to "her children" and let's face it neither would Holyrood would they? Until we face the fact that these "elected" representatives represent no-one but themselves at the moment nothing will ever get any better no matter who you vote for. Bring out the darts, the voter's roll and a child in each constituency, .......... if you dare to see what a true representative democracy can do for you. Any other way is simply tinkering with a fatally flawed and completely rigged system.
27

barbour,

Sandbanks 25/05/2009 13:10:54
#26
Also applies to all the other "Independance Whingers"
It would appear,if these posts are a yardstick that the Scottish people and by the press south of the border,that an independant Scotland is a common aim albeit for differing reasons.
Scottish reasons, to determine their own fiscal future based on whatever the expert of the day spews out.
English reasons,to maximise English taxation for English policies and return English jobs to England.
All MOD work and bases relocated to England with the associated supporting activities.
28

barbour,

Sandbanks 25/05/2009 13:16:43
#28
Can I suggest the "Primaries" system for the election of all political representatives.
Cut the extravagant drivel in your post and come to the point.
29

Observer,,

Glasgow 25/05/2009 13:23:01
Seems a neat methodology for shoe-horning in whoever you want, without said candidate having to have made any previous commitment to either politics or the Tories. I wonder who Cameron has in mind ?......
30

Curley Bill,

25/05/2009 13:45:15
#29 Barbour - Trident on the Thames? Good call!
31

Number 6,

Germany 25/05/2009 14:35:40
29 Baba,

"English reasons,to maximise English taxation for English policies and return English jobs to England.
All MOD work and bases relocated to England with the associated supporting activities".

Yet another complete little Empire Biscuit.

Return all MOD work to England ? What about contractural tendering?

What if scottish firms continually provided a better deal than English firms, do you think that the MOD wou;ld say, no you can't have them because your Scottish?.

Have you the slightest idea just how much MOD business has gone abroad? Clearly not or you would not be posting such tripe.

Your ignorance outs you as the classic unionista foot soldier.
32

,

25/05/2009 16:20:19
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
33

Sgian Achlais,

25/05/2009 21:52:50
29barbour, Sandbanks 25/05/2009 13:10:54
#26
Also applies to all the other "Independance Whingers"
It would appear,if these posts are a yardstick that the Scottish people and by the press south of the border,that an independant Scotland is a common aim albeit for differing reasons.

=====================

Scottish reasons, to determine their own fiscal future based on whatever the expert of the day spews out.

English reasons,to maximise English taxation for English policies and return English jobs to England.
All MOD work and bases relocated to England with the associated supporting activities.

====================

Barbour,

What a charming fellow you are. If you applied some of the English politeness people would engage you more often.

I want for Scotland what most people in the western world would consider normal democratic representation. The people of Scotland should be able to decide who we elect and who we vote out. I expect that government to make the decisions based wholly on the needs of the Scottish people and its best interests.

The current Westminster system does not allow us to select a government. We are only able to participate in elections then wait to see who the people of England selected.

We are about to have a government that a tiny fraction of the Scottish population will have voted for. A government that does not represent the voting intentions of the population is not democratic.

Our need for self governance is entirely a Scottish issue for the future. The relationship between our nations should normalise to friendly neighbours with a healthy competition.

We share many families, friends and working relationships both sides of the border. It should be cause for celebration the UK wide.

England will have full democratic government, no more Scottish Labour votes passing decisions on English only issues. Politicians are slippery enough without being able to pass legislation that affects people who cannot vot
34

redcliffe62,

26/05/2009 03:54:03
i agree that berwick should be allowed to rejoin if the people want to do so. stand an snp candidate in berwick with special dispensation, or the snp will be seen as a british party and only get party broadcasts pro rata through the uk, instead of extensive coverage in scotland. if berwick joined, which it would be nmad not to, with health and old age care key issues, methinks that such an outcome will scupper the oil argument that it is in england once and for all. as the border would once again have to be redrawn properly, and not changed as in 1998 at midnight with no discussion by a tory labour cabal.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.