Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Drink Driving, Don't Risk It!

Abortions in Scotland soar to record high with 38 performed every day

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 May 2008
SCOTLAND saw a record number of abortions last year, with new figures showing a continuing rise since Britain legalised the practice in 1968.
There were 13,703 abortions carried out last year – an average of 38 per day – compared to 13,163 the previous year.

Pro-life groups reacted angrily when it emerged that 372 patients having abortions were under 16 years of age.

The statistics
emerged just days after Westminster voted to keep the upper legal limit for abortions at 24 weeks, disappointing campaigners who wanted to see a change in the law. The recent vote blocked attempts to lower the limit, in the first re-examination of abortion legislation in almost two decades.

The upper limit for abortion was reduced from 28 weeks to 24 weeks in 1990.

Last night, Mary Scanlon MSP, the Scottish Tories' health spokeswoman, said:

"The rising number of abortions is a serious cause of concern, particularly in tandem with the revelation that more than a quarter of women having abortions in 2007 had a previous termination as well.

"There is a general consensus that abortion should not be used as a form of contraception. Sadly, it appears that, for some women, this could be the case."

Ms Scanlon said it was crucial that NHS staff offered support and treatment as well as advice on contraception for the future, adding: "This is especially vital when 372 of women having abortions were under 16."

Abortion levels stand at about a quarter of the number of births in Scotland, which hit 57,781 in 2007. The overwhelming majority – 99.3 per cent – of abortions last year were carried out on NHS premises, the Scottish Government figures revealed yesterday.

The abortion rate was highest among 16- to 19-year-olds (24.9 per 1,000) and 20- to 24-year-olds (24.5 per 1,000).

A spokesman for Mario Conti, the archbishop of Glasgow, said: "It is deeply disheartening to see the abortion figures continue to rise year after year. One abortion is one too many, but 13,703 is beyond imagination."

The spokesman added: "These statistics are an ever-present sign that society has failed both Scotland's unborn children and women."

However, a spokesman for Marie Stopes International, the pro-choice charity, said last night that the rise in abortions merely reflected demand and the change in the status of women in the 21st century. The spokesman added: "The role and status and expectations of women in Scotland have changed astronomically since the 1960s.

"The number of abortions reflects demand. Women are able to control their fertility.

"We cannot have a return to back-street abortions."

Ian Murray, from the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, said the abortion statistics showed that society was letting women down. He added: "Either our sexual health policies don't teach women anything about their fertility, or life in Scotland has been reduced to a commodity that can be disposed to suit the convenience of others.

"The reality is these statistics refer to human lives – both the babies lost and the women whose lives will be scarred by their decision forever."

The number of late abortions fell last year, with only 44 terminations carried out at 20 weeks or beyond, compared to 49 in 2006 and 67 in 2005.

The figures also revealed that abortion levels were highest in poorer areas, prompting fresh calls for action to tackle poverty.

In areas of high deprivation, the rate was 17.4 per 1,000, nearly double the rate of 9.6 per 1,000 for the least deprived areas of Scotland. The abortion rate was highest in NHS Tayside at 17.1 per 1,000 women (aged 15-44), while the Island boards (Orkney, Shetland and Western Isles) had the lowest rates at 6.1 per 1,000.

Ross Finnie, the Liberal Democrats' health spokesman, said: "While it is important that abortion remains available under the legal framework of the NHS, I am concerned at the clear link between deprivation and increased abortion rates.

"It is clear that if the Scottish Government wants to reduce the number of abortions, it must focus its efforts on addressing the root causes of deprivation."

Early terminations continued to rise, with more than two-thirds (69 per cent) performed at less than ten weeks in 2007. This compares to 55.8 per cent in 1992, when medical terminations were introduced.

By comparison, in England and Wales, the total number of abortions was 193,737 in 2006 – 530 per day.

Each year, thousands of women travel to Britain for an abortion. The procedure remains illegal in Northern Ireland, except in limited circumstances when "serious risk" is posed to the mother's life, or her physical or mental health.

Almost 1,300 women from Northern Ireland travelled to Britain for abortions in 2006, according to Marie Stopes International.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 May 2008 12:14 AM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Abortion
 
1

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 28/05/2008 00:08:25
Its of NO surprise atall these figures and the "Health Chiefs" appear to live in,..'Cloud Cuckoo Land' deluding themselves into polices of disaster, re this subject!

For 2weeks the News Media 'more-or-less' advertised that "Abortion" was going to get the "OK" up to 24weeks green light again, which it did!

Girls are being told "Have this 'jab' protect yourselves from cancer" at 13years old!

The only message this gets across at 13years old is,.

"I'm safe to Have Sex Now"!

And You Wonder why the figures are High,?

Yes we made the figures for what they are, We are to blame!

Why,..'Cry Wolf' now!,?
2

Alan Reid,

NZ 28/05/2008 00:39:37
It's better abortion than taking a child into the world unwanted, it's sad but buts the way it is.
There is 6 billion people on the planet, and THAT is a disaster slowy happening, anything that helps keep the population down is better.
3

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 28/05/2008 01:01:32

Alan Reid @#2,

You are not quite true in what you say.

Fertility issues are now exceeding 1in6 couples in many parts of the World, such as the case for the UK, infact it is becoming such an issue, some Government's are giving couples incentives to have a Baby, re their worry of the widening 'Age-Gap',..

To Which unless resolved, will affect everyone and our economy as we know it.

4

Guga II,

Rockall 28/05/2008 01:43:30
It's a lot cheaper to provide abortions for single women and girls than it is for the taxpayer to have to support them on welfare, and to provide housing for them.

Maybe they should be providing free condoms to anyone who wants them. That might cut the costs even further.
5

Nikostratos,

28/05/2008 01:56:15
Ignore Guga he is sick...................

I thought you would like to have more not less Scots keep the population growing as opposed to more 'Foreigners' Guga's favorite word
6

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 28/05/2008 02:01:53
Guga ll,

It is of pure 'fallacy' that Girls get pregnant to get free housing, this is a contortion of the truth, from bad press.
7

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 28/05/2008 02:08:43
Nikostratos @#5,

That is exactly what IS happening!!

Our immigrants now are having more 'Babies' than we do!

We are told to get 'Ridd' pregnancy is ugly!

While the others propagate!

They even kept the date for "Abortion" at 24weeks to make this realisation.
8

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 28/05/2008 02:17:21

And to this end!....

You cannot! even purchase maternity wear in Edinburgh without massive searching!

Re: 'NO-ONE' has Babies these days, why sell Materity Wear!


'ABSOLUTLY SHOCKING'!!
9

Green,

28/05/2008 02:28:04
Why? Humans are now needing to reduce their numbers, because of overuse of oil, water and food stocks. Yes, Germany and Russia are putting in place pro-natalist policies. Neither has a good history on pro-natalism. Remember Hitler? A loan to every married man he could then reduce by producing children, from his wife?

The brief pause in Europe between Romania and the resurgence of pro-natalism today? Romania until 1989 - remember - no abortion, no contraception, every woman to have a medical exam regularly at work to check she had not had an abortion or used contraception, taxes on the childless. This led to rampant child abandonment, a huge number of street children, dreadful under funded orphanages and huge surge in HIV in the reign of the Ceausescu’s. Why? For the greater glory of – what?

Pro-natalist policies have a dreadful history.

The EU institutions are now urging them on all EU countries see COM (2006) 157. Why? Outdated ideas about how the economy should grow? Anti immigrant rhetoric? There will not be enough people to fund our pensions?

Regardless of the environmentally degraded world our children will inherit?

10

W Smith,

Middle East 28/05/2008 04:45:21
If women had to pay for abortions there would be less of them.

If you can afford the sex holiday in Spain darling then you can afford the abortions.

Some elderly folks in Dundee have to wait for around 10 months for a hip replacement at Ninewells Hospital - that's because the surgeons are too busy doing abortions!

Women tell us, "Its my body!"

Aye, and the cost of your abortion should be charged to your account.

If you're boyfriend/husband isn't prepared to pay for it why should the taxpayer?

BTW
1) Many women have had up to four abortions, something that's not mentioned in this article.

Ross Finnie, the wacko, thinks its because they're four times as 'poor'.

2) The SNP are more interested in demonstrating outside US consulate over the well-being of the poor wee souls locked up in Guatanamo Bay in an effort to convince the rest of us that they care about the 'value of human life'.

So the unborn child is sub-human or not as human as the muslim terrorists (or is it freedom fighters?) locked up in Cuba, eh Salmond?

3) The high abortion rates in Dundee are more likely to be connected to IQ (and EQ) levels than 'deprivation'.
11

somerferg,

perth 28/05/2008 06:25:43
W Smith

What a nasty, ignorant set of comments from you (quelle surprise). Lets revisit them for a moment:

1. If women had to pay blah,blah... Well chum they do in their taxes you clown.
2. Women has had up to 4 abortions blah, blah... says who exactely? Oh you well it might be right then eh.
3. The SNP blah, blah... Oh yes couldn't resist having a go at Alex Salmond and the SNP. More verbal diahorrea from you.
4. High abortions rates in Dundee blah, blah... Not from Dundee myself but I can guarantee a far more intelligent conversation with a Dundonian then you you prat.

As a better person than me once said W Smith - go boil your heid.
12

Green booger,

28/05/2008 07:57:17
There were 13,703 child murders carried out last year...
13

IanW,

Ottobrunn 28/05/2008 08:20:34
I wonder about the 372 under 16's who had abortions. How many of the partners have been prosecuted for under-age sex?


somerferg #11 - Try living in the real world. Abortions are like cosmetic surgery. Not necessary so why should the tax payer foot the bill. It is a private decision to have an abortion so these women should have their abortions done privately and foot the bill themselves.

Secondly the government released a report last week (read the back issues in the Scotsman) where clear details were given about some (a few) women indeed had had four or more abortions. That implies that either they are using abortion as a form of contraception or that they are incapable of taking the necessary precautions to avoid pregnancy which implies that they are probably not fit to be a parent and look after a child.

As for Dundee, I lived there for many years, and I was glad to leave as it is a dump with too many morons living there. For a long time Dundee had the highest illegitamcy rates in the whole of Scotland. I would not be surprised that Ninewells are to busy doing abortions to treat real needy patients.
14

paulr,

edinburgh 28/05/2008 08:27:00
So thats approximately 9% of the total from england and wales, not a bad record in comparison, regarldess of the whingeing of all the religious nutters.
15

A.A.,

Edinburgh 28/05/2008 08:47:39
#2
There is such a thing as "contraception!!"
16

A.E.M.,

Inverness 28/05/2008 08:56:18
Some of the arguements in this comments section are sad - being that there is an increase in the availability of birth control, including for us men, there should be no need for the increase in the number of abortions - it's a bit selfish ending one life just because you didn't have the fore sight to plan in your own.

As for Alan Reid's (#2) comment that the world was over populated, etc - fell free to go and make space for someone else - that's if you are so concerned about there being too many of us. Actually it's more a case of those who have, not sharing with those who have not. Everyone in the world could fit into the state of Texas and the population density would be worse than Hong Kong but not half as bad as Monaco - bit of a tight squeeze but possible.

So the problem is how we share what we have, and what you'd do with your sheep (10 sheep for every Kiwi - there is a problem!!)
17

Boy Wonder,

28/05/2008 09:10:06
Without so many terminations (abortion is such an ugly word), we'd have overpopulation on a grand scale. Is that what the pro-lifers want??

Frankly it's nobody's business but the woman concerned, her partner (if there is one) and her doctor! Nobody else has any "right" to get involved.
18

JG,

Fife 28/05/2008 09:12:50
That's right guys, women become pregnant by binary fission; it's all their own fault. Imagine being stupid enough to "get yourself pregnant"! And of course when an accident DOES happen, their partner will stick by them through thick and thin. AYE, RIGHT!!

38 terminations a day IS a very sad statistic but not for the reasons some of you think!
19

ddmc,

28/05/2008 10:09:13
There's a very funny movie called idiocracy, but the underlying message is that people at the lower end of the IQ scale tend to have the most children.
20

psycho,

Edinbra 28/05/2008 10:11:05
The Labour Party has no moral basis in their relentless pursuit of the destruction of human beings in the womb.They will lose the next election and have allowed a very mediocre Cameron to gain the upper hand -so be it.
Who knows what contribution these 38 children who,on average,are destroyed every day in Scotland could make to the welfare of this country?
The child as a disposable commodity is now well established in the minds of many
21

pwd,

Borders 28/05/2008 10:28:46
The Union, the SNP, the price of fuel, etc, etc, ad infinitum, seem insignificant in the midst of this mass extermination of human beings. We British should think very deeply about our own part in the greatest barbarism ever perpetrated on the human race.
22

MoragtheToerag,

Argyll 28/05/2008 11:02:19
Oh, yes, W Smith, it's ALL the woman's fault. She gets herself pregnant. No such thing as pressure from the male partner, male partners refusing to wear condoms, male partners telling her they'll leave her if she doesn't abort, male partners dumping her when finding out she's pregnant.

What an ignorant, misogynist post! Let's hope you don't have children you're passing on such hateful ideas to.

Charles, I'm sorry you're having fertility issues. But that isn't the case for a vast majority of people, so procedures need to be available to everyone to curb reproduction.

We're already having crisis of resources, and things are going to get worse as the environment changes and the population rises.

Try adopting if you are having trouble reproducing biologically. There are other ways to parent besides biologically.
23

radge dug,

28/05/2008 13:19:43
W Smith - can tell you're a Muslim fanatic. Maybe the men should pay for the abortions?

Maybe we should stop listening to religious leaders on this subject. People aint gonna stop having sex, so we might as well teach them to use and supply decent contraception. It's not as if either Catholicism or Presbyterianism shows the way forward morally. The number of sexual 'scandals' in Christianity is staggering, given the moral high ground they claim to stand on.
24

Media 1,

south africa 28/05/2008 14:59:14
Disturbing news indeed!
Is there any support for the women who go through this?
Ridding your body of a fetus you dont want is ok if it is done within the proper time frame, but what about the person who has just had the abortion? What happens to them?
25

hertscot,

28/05/2008 15:03:49
Pro-life groups reacted angrily when it emerged that 372 patients having abortions were under 16 years of age.
That'll be the same Pro-life groups who get support from churches, who don't believe in preventative contaception?
26

HarderTruth,

28/05/2008 18:49:21
Charles,
Did you listen to one minute of the Commons debate on the Embryology Bill, and its time-limit for terminations? Thought not. It was well argued, thoughtful, passionate and thorough. The Government lifted the whip on several provisions including the time-limits. You may be the world's pub expert on fertility, but somehow I missed you when watching evidence being taken. I did however hear several medical professionals who have spent their lives working in this field (the very people to whom you now turn for help). Most (agreed, not all) were of the opinion that medical viability of the fetus has not changed much in the last twenty years and that a clinical case for reduction simply had not been made. If politically or morally you want it to be different, vote for those who are committed to deliver your aims but spare us your tenants lager sermonising.
27

Agent 99,

28/05/2008 20:25:46
[1,3,6,7,8] Charles: An idiosycratic style of writing you've got; punctuation outnumbering the letter count.

If life in your house is anything like your writing style the revalations above come as no surprise. Too many exclamations reduce your fertility, don't you know?

Cool it, reduce the stress. Life's too short...
28

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 28/05/2008 21:08:22
Agent 99,

Dont worry all IS stress free BTW,..

"idiosycratic" was not found in Collins English Dictionary,

Please check your spelling and try again
29

garef,

28/05/2008 21:17:16
For me it is not realistic to continue with a pregnancy that is seriously unwanted!
30

psycho,

EDINBRA 28/05/2008 21:32:49
MEDIA

They frequently experience post abortion syndrome as a result of an adult decision taken by them to take the life of the child they are carrying.You can invent alternative terms but the reality is that they,along with the doctors involved,have taken the life of a human person and there is always considerable guilt and related psychological consequences -it is the loss of their child and that inevitably has traumatic consequences.They have my full sympathy but you cannot change the reality of the situation
31

,

28/05/2008 21:51:23
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
32

HarderTruth,

28/05/2008 21:57:29
Charlie
"idiosyncratic" : meaning your style of writing is your own personal expression of bonkerism, as is the syndromic illness resultant from being bonkers.
33

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 28/05/2008 22:13:17
re:~35,

'HA-HA', very funny!

"bonkerism" was not found in Collins English Dictionary FREE .

Please check your spelling and try again.


34

HarderTruth,

28/05/2008 22:38:38
Charlie,
You're only checking for free words. You need to pay for the more sophisticated ones.
35

Karin,

28/05/2008 23:27:27
#28
Yes, because abortions are so much easier than taking the pill, and not physically or emotionally painful at all.

Isn't it interesting that when women have abortions they are called murderers, but when they choose to keep the child despite poverty, many existing children, single parent status, they are castigated for being irresponsible and a burden on the state. Damned if you do and damned if you don't, seems to be the situation.

May I remind you all that despite comments that seem to imply the opposite, we still do not have abortion on demand in this country? Every abortion requires the signature of two doctors, in accordance with the 1967 Act.
36

Em,

29/05/2008 15:01:27
#29 Harder Truth

Regarding your opinion on fetal viability being the drving factor behind determining the appropriate age at which abortions may be carried out.

Many issues have been overlooked when determining the age at which a fetus becomes viable.

The fact that some have survived between 20-24 weeks who have no health problems is proof that the infant at this stage is already highly developed and it is therefor unethical to end the life of a baby in this late stage.

But what many have not considered is weather or not there are sufficient attempts to save a baby who is born premature (20-24 weeks)as this would clearly have an impact on fetus viability statistics.

The reason there is such a low survival rate among premature babies 20-24 weeks is because doctors believe resuscitating them is pointless. Professor John Wyatt, consultant neonatologist at University College London hospital, says a laissez-faire culture in British hospitals is denying babies born at 23 weeks the chance of survival.

In a submission to a parliamentary inquiry, Wyatt says that up to 42% of babies born at 23 weeks survive at some British hospitals. However, the average national survival rate is only 10%-15%. Wyatt says this is because many doctors are not even attempting to save the babies.

Many centres of excellence, including those from the US, Sweden and Australia, have published data showing survival figures of 30%-60% at 23 weeks and 40%-70% at 24 weeks. If the average outcome figures in the UK are so much worse, we must ask the question, why? The conclusion must be that babies are dying who could have survived to live a healthy life.

There are also reports that at least 66 infants survived NHS-funded abortion attempts in one year alone. According to the report, by the Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH), about half of the surviving children lived for an hour, while one survived ten hours breathing unaided.

In Britain, once a child s
37

Em,

29/05/2008 15:02:12
contd...

In Britain, once a child slated for death by abortion is born alive, no medical help is offered him. On the contrary, guidelines from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists offered doctors the recommendation that babies over 22 weeks old who survive abortion be killed by lethal injection.

I'm uncertain as to what the law says on this but any rational person can see that this is nothing less than infanticide.
38

Evia,

29/05/2008 20:17:53
Abortion is murder.

I have never been of the opinion that abortion is ok. I believe that it is only acceptable if the woman's life is in danger.

Too many women these days are having abortions because babies interfere with their lifestyle. If they don't want babies they shouldn't be having sex. Sleeping around and then aborting babies is only what trollops would do.

look at this and if you still believe it's oK to have abortions, you heart is a chunk of stone.

www.silentscream.org/
39

Owl700,

Canada 30/05/2008 16:57:32
Here in Ontario, Canada, we have abortion on demand, and gestation doesn’t matter. Birth control and condoms are relativity cheap and readily available. These wouldn’t mean much without education in place. Young people have begun learning in school that sex involves more than reproduction, and that their feelings are perfectly natural. (Thank you, also,Sue Johanson for tech support!)

It is time to lift the dark shroud around a perfectly natural biological function, sex. By giving knowledge to our young people, the abortion rate has actually dropped here, and 90 % those who have to make that difficult decision do so within the first trimester. Teen pregnancies rates are down. Kids are actually making informed decisions about whether or not to have sex, and are looking after their health in the process.
After reading Arthur Herman’s “How the Scots Invented the Modern World”, I see Scotland as a land that relishes freedom and education. Arm your young people with knowledge, and I guarantee they will definitely surprise you.



 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.