Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 23rd November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Ross Lydall's by-election blog



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 July 2008
Friday, 11.20am

OK. First things first. I was wrong. I predicted that Labour would hang on to Glasgow East.
But the political earthquake forecast by SNP First Minister Alex Salmond arrived on time - if after a pointless recount. Well done to them, and to new MP John Mason. Gordon Brown is in terrible trouble.

The task of defending the Prime Minister and
explaining away the defeat went this morning to Des Browne, the Scottish Secretary. He and David Cairns, the Scotland Office minister, have just held a press conference at John Smith House, the party HQ in Glagsow. I'm off to Mr Salmond's victory walkabout at the Fort shopping centre in Parkhead in a minute.

The Labour press conference was not quite as solemn or introspective as I expected, Mr Browne's steady delivery perhaps acting like a soothing balm on a media pack weary after only several hours' sleep.

He warned against Labour deposing its leader, said the party had run an "excellent campaign" and claimed that Margaret Curran was the "outstanding candidate" of the contest and would have made an excellent MP. He suggested that - should she wish - she may yet have her chance to represent Glasgow East in Westminster.

Mr Browne began with the following: "Last night was a bad night for us. The people of Glasgow East sent us a clear message. We will examine what that message means and we will respond to it."

Asked whether it was time for the Prime Minister to go - or for others to give him a shove, the Scottish Secretary said: "No. He is a man who has a formidable combination of strengths. The party knows and understands that. Apart from anything else, our party learned from bitter experience how much we turn the electorate off if we turn inward on ourselves."

He added: "We have to look at the challenges we face and say: Are we better placed to deal with those challenges without the leadership of the most competent economic politican in more than a generation that this country has produced?"

He continued to praise Mr Brown's economic might and said that the state of the world economy had fuelled Labour's defeat.
"At the heart of this there is a difficult message for us, but we have will continue to hear it."

Little terribly memorable, as you see. It will all be superceded in the day when Mr Brown himself refuses to bow to the result, and Labour backbenchers start popping up on Sky news predicting doom and gloom if he remains. As expected, the SNP aren't really the story - but deserved congratulations to them nonetheless.

Ross Lydall is The Scotsman's political editor.



The full article contains 451 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

it has always been allan,

25/07/2008 13:16:41
I am betting Brown will stay.

He is physicly and mentaly incabable of admitting he is wrong about anything.

He must have clout in his party, to have been able to unseat Blair, who may now be laughing.
Not laughing are many labour MP's, who would not enjoy losing ther seats and going to the job centre.

2

Hugo of Garven,

25/07/2008 21:03:53
"As expected, the SNP aren't really the story . . . "

After all they didn't lose the election as expected.

A 22 percent swing is not really newsworthy.

We must get our priorities right.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.