Sentences too lenient
Last week, a woman went on holiday and left her Jack Russell to starve to death. The court could have imposed a heavy fine, imprisonment and a lifetime ban on keeping animals. Instead, she was simply admonished.
This week, a gamekeeper poisoned wildlife, putting the public at risk. The court could have imposed a prison sentence and fined him up to 85,000; instead, he was fined a mere 5,500.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdThe punishment in both cases is unlikely to discourage other offenders and can hardly be called justice.
The Scottish Executive is currently drafting a new animal welfare bill, but legislation can be effective only if the courts implement stricter sentencing.
LYNDA KORIMBOCCUS
Queensferry Street
Edinburgh