Partygate: Boris Johnson should go for 'misleading the House', which should be a resigning offence at both Westminster and Holyrood – Brian Wilson
The distinction is really important for the alternative, with which we are all too familiar in Scotland, is “say anything and get away with it if you have a brass neck and a majority”.
When stories about parties emerged, Johnson might have buried them with honesty. “Things happened that shouldn’t have… we were all under stress… I take responsibility.” That might have washed.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdHis instinct however was to insist “no rules were broken” and brass it out. Thereafter, every misdemeanour became evidence of a larger crime – “misleading the House”. So why does that matter so much?
Keir Starmer put it well in Thursday’s debate: “The convention Parliament must not be misled and, in return, we do not accuse each other of lying are not curious quirks of this strange place but fundamental pillars on which our constitution is built, and they are observed wherever parliamentary democracy thrives. With them, our public debate is elevated.”
To some around politics, this might sound like mumbo-jumbo, to be trampled on as required. If Johnson’s political demise becomes a landmark in re-asserting a noble principle, it will serve an historically useful purpose.
Neither should it be a principle exclusive to Westminster. Let us not forget that Nicola Sturgeon was found by her peers to have misled a parliamentary committee under oath and she did brass it out. I would definitely add "ferries" to that charge-sheet. We must hope the Mother of Parliaments remains capable of higher standards.
Comments
Want to join the conversation? Please or to comment on this article.