Glasgow Academy Master banned for improper conduct
![Glasgow Academy where a Master has been suspended. Picture: TSPL](https://www.scotsman.com/webimg/legacy_elm_34366445.jpg?crop=3:2,smart&width=640&quality=65&enable=upscale)
![Glasgow Academy where a Master has been suspended. Picture: TSPL](/img/placeholder.png)
Damian Etherington, who abruptly left the staff of the £10,000 per year Glasgow Academy after the allegations came to light, confessed to a string of charges at the General Teaching Council hearing in Edinburgh.
However, his denial to claims by the pupil that the pair indulged in a sex act in the teacher’s bed was accepted.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdHe was deemed unfit to teach for “putting himself in a highly dangerous situation” and was struck off for two years following the four-day hearing.
The pupil, who was 18 at the time, told how Etherington had phoned him to suggest they meet up in a pub in May 2012.
Hours later, the history teacher invited the teenager to his home, where more alcohol was taken - and eventually asked the boy to stay overnight.
The hearing was told the pupil slept in Etherington’s bed, however they accepted his insistence that the pair were never in bed together.
In their findings, the GTC panel said: “It was accepted, on balance, that he (Etherington) had thought it would be better for the pupil to allow him to stay overnight and return home the following morning - rather than for him to attempt to get home so late that evening.”
But they ruled that the master had “at the very least, shown a significant lack of judgement by not maintaining appropriate boundaries.”
They added: “The public perception would be that his actions had been highly inappropriate and his behaviour fell significantly short of the standard expected of a registered teacher.
“He had put himself in a highly dangerous situation and had failed to take specific advice from colleagues.”
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdSeveral other accusations against Etherington were found unproved by the panel.
They included claims that he exchanged texts with sexual dialogue with the pupil and that he had made improper suggestions to him on an aircraft during an school trip abroad.
He was also alleged to have unbuttoned the boy’s shirt in a classroom.